Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT151 S4 Q19 Explanation

Any government practice that might

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Any government practice that might facilitate the abuse of power should not be undertaken except in cases in which there is a compelling reason to do so. The keeping of government secrets is one such practice. Though government officials are sometimes justified in keeping secrets, too often they keep secrets for insubstantial they are keeping a secret, this practice opens up even greater opportunity for abuse.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: most cases8% picked this

    In most cases in which government officials conceal information from the public, they are not

    We only hear about quantities like "sometimes" and "too often". We have no idea what is true in most (i.e. more than 50% of) cases. To derive this answer, we would need to have been told that in most cases that government officials conceal information, they do not have compelling reasons.

  2. Unsupported Relationship20% picked this

    In those cases in which government officials have a compelling reason to keep a secret, doing so does not

    We don't have any way to say definitively what happens when officials do have a compelling reason. We certainly can't draw a connection from "if compelling reason, then doesn't facilitate abuse of power". This is garbling together ideas from the first sentence, but those two ideas are not conditionally connected at all (they're both ideas that come from the trigger of the rule).

  3. Correct51% picked this

    A government official who justifiably keeps a secret should not conceal its existence without having a compelling

    Why this is right

    This uses a specific storyline to be weird and un-tempting, but it reinforces the connection we made between the last sentence and the first sentence. The fact that the secret was justifiably kept in the first place has nothing to do with this answer being right/wrong. It's just an extraneous detail. Since concealing that a secret is being kept is a practice that might facilitate the abuse of power, we know that government officials shouldn't do it unless there is a compelling reason to do so.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Unsupported Relationship16% picked this

    Government officials who conceal information without a compelling reason are thereby guilty of an

    We don't have any rule that allows us to say, "you are guilty of abuse of power." That would look like this: _____________ → abused power Our conditionals look like this: practice might facilitate abuse and → shouldn't do it no compelling reason govt official conceals from opens up public that they're keeping → possibility for a secret abuse

  5. Too Strong5% picked this

    Government officials should keep information secret only if doing so does not make it easier for those officials

    This rule (when we contrapose it says), if keeping info secret does should not make it easier for officials → keep info to abuse power secret That's too strong an idea, when the paragraph is not saying they should never keep secrets; it allows for the fact that you can keep a secret if there's a compelling reason to do so.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free