Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT151 S3 Q7 ExplanationIf rational-choice theory is correct

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

If rational-choice theory is correct, then people act only in ways that they expect will benefit themselves. But this means that rational-choice theory cannot be correct, because plenty of examples exist result in no personal benefit whatsoever.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

The argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds

Answer choices, explained

  1. Circular Reasoning2% picked this

    assumes as a premise the contention the argument purports

    The "contention that this argument purports to establish" is the conclusion that rational-choice theory cannot be correct. The argument is not also assuming this as a premise.

  2. Bad Evidence Match2% picked this

    concludes that a theory is false merely on the grounds that the evidence for

    The argument concludes that rational-choice theory is incorrect. But it doesn't state that the evidence for rational-choice theory is merely hypothetical.

  3. Negation4% picked this

    takes for granted that people who are acting in ways that are personally beneficial expected that their actions

    benefit self ? expect benefit self This is the negation of the assumption that the argument makes.

  4. Irrelevant Comparison5% picked this

    presumes, without justification, that examples of people acting in ways that are not personally beneficial greatly outnumber examples of people acting in

    The evidence states that people sometimes act in ways that are not personally beneficial. The argument doesn't depend on any assumption that there are more examples of this than examples of people acting in ways that are personally beneficial.

  5. Correct86% picked this

    fails to consider that people acting in ways that result in no personal benefit may nonetheless have expected that acting in those

    Why this is right

    "Fails to consider" means this answer describes something that should weaken the argument. This answer negates the assumption that, if a person's action does not benefit them, they were not expecting the action to benefit them. In other words, the argument assumes "if not X then not Y." This answer choice is saying, "if not X, Y might still be true."

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free