Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT151 S3 Q20 ExplanationThe level of triglycerides in the blood

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The level of triglycerides in the blood rises when triglycerides are inadequately metabolized. Research shows that patients with blood triglyceride levels above 1 milligram per milliliter are twice as prone to heart attacks as others. Thus, it is likely that consuming large amounts of fat, processed sugar, in the blood, is a factor causing heart disease.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens

Answer choices, explained

  1. No Impact25% picked this

    People with a high-fat diet who engage in regular, vigorous physical activity are much less likely to develop heart disease than are

    If we had evidence of high-fat diets being correlated with lower risk of heart disease, that would weaken the plausibility of the author's conclusion. But this answer doesn't say "people on high fat diets have a lower risk than those who aren't on such diets". It compares groups with two differences: "high-fat + heavy exercise" vs. "low-fat + little exercise". We can't draw any good conclusions when there are two variables changing. Which of the two variables accounts for the difference?

  2. No Impact3% picked this

    Triglyceride levels above 2 milligrams per milliliter increase the risk of some serious illnesses not

    This conclusion is only about heart disease, so talking about other serious illnesses is pretty irrelevant. If anything, though, this answer may strengthen the plausibility of the author's causal story a little, insofar as it would show an example of high blood triglyceride increasing (i.e. influencing) the risk of other illnesses.

  3. No Impact3% picked this

    Shortly after a person ceases to regularly consume alcohol and processed sugar, that person’s triglyceride

    This doesn't strengthen or weaken, but it's very compatible with what we already heard. We know that consuming alcohol and processed sugar are known to increase triglyceride levels in the blood, so we would expect that if you ceased regularly consuming these things, your triglyceride levels would go down.

  4. Correct68% picked this

    Heart disease interferes with the body’s ability to

    Why this is right

    This does what we expect Weaken correct answers to do when an author presents a correlation and assumes one possible causal explanation for it: it provides an Alternate Explanation for the correlation. This is the Reverse Cause explanation. High blood triglyceride isn't correlated with heart disease / heart attacks because the high blood triglyceride causes the heart disease. Instead, this answer suggests, they're correlated because heart disease causes the high blood triglycerides. After all, heart disease causes the body trouble with metabolizing triglycerides, and the first sentence tells us that when we can't metabolize triglycerides, it raises our blood triglyceride level.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. No Impact1% picked this

    People who maintain strict regimens for their health tend to adopt low-fat diets and to avoid

    If anything, this very mildly strengthens the author's case by corroborating that avoiding fat / alcohol / sugar is associated with health. But what people tend to do for their health doesn't really help us analyze whether these substances specifically impact heart disease risk.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free