Anthropologist: For early humans who moved from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to agriculture, the transition must have been traumatic. There would have been increased incidence of disease and injury and a more homogeneous diet lacking vital nutrients more easily obtainable from the richly varied diet of hunter-gatherers. Thus, groups that made the transition opportunities for the accumulation of wealth by those with specialized social roles.
What this question is testing
Conclusion
Early humans must have had a compelling reason to switch to farming — the anthropologist suggests the lure of settled-life perks like wealth.
Evidence
Farming life was objectively worse: more disease, injuries, boring diet. The fact that groups switched despite suffering implies something good was pulling them.
Evaluate
The "traumatic" claim is the logical middle child — supported by evidence below it, supporting the conclusion above it.
Goal
Expect the answer to describe it as a claim supported by evidence that also supports the conclusion.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.