Reading Comprehension

PT157 · S4 · P4 · Q26 Patenting Software

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

This passage was adapted from an article published in 1991.

Topic

Legal protection for computer software, specifically the debate over whether copyright or patent law is more appropriate.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Patents should not be extended to software programs because software is better protected under copyright law, which already offers sufficient financial incentive for innovation; software algorithms represent general ideas, not inventive processes, and should not be patentable. (The "Most Valuable Sentence" expressing this appears at the start of Paragraph 3: )

P1: Introduction to the Problem and the Debate

Most people agree that software creators need some legal protection from copycats to keep innovation profitable, and while copyright is widely seen as effective, some argue that patent protection should also cover software.

P2: Explaining Algorithms and the Patent Argument

This paragraph explains what algorithms are, and notes that software encodes these algorithms. Proponents of software patents claim that encoding algorithms is like designing a patentable process—like inventing a new way to run a chemical reaction. However, the author argues that algorithms are generic principles, not inventions, and thus shouldn’t be patentable—just as physical laws or general principles aren’t.

P3: Arguing for Copyright, Not Patents

The author claims that granting patents to software would give developers extra protection they don’t really need; software is more suitably protected by copyright, which covers specific ways of expressing ideas, not the underlying concepts themselves. A slight change to copyright laws would be enough, maintaining incentives for innovation without overprotecting software creators.

26.

Based on the passage, it can be inferred that proponents of software patents are most likely to hold which one of the following views?

The sequences of computer code
Wrong Viewpoint
This is what the author is arguing. He thinks that expressions of algorithm in code should be protected by copyright because that is where the intellectual property occurs. He thinks that algorithms are less genuinely a product of inventiveness, more like a natural principle everyone knows. This is his rationale for rejecting patent protection so it wouldn't make sense for it to be an opinion shared by proponents of patent protection.
28% picked this
Software algorithms are generic principles
Wrong Viewpoint
This is what the author is arguing. He thinks that expressions of algorithm in code should be protected by copyright because that is where the intellectual property occurs. But he thinks that algorithms are more like a general principle that can't be patented. This is his rationale for rejecting patent protection so it wouldn't make sense for it to be an opinion shared by proponents of patent protection.
8% picked this
Patent protection should supplant copyright
Too Strong
This goes beyond any proposal we know the proponents have made. We only know that they want patent protection for the underlying algorithms. We don't have any support that they think "there should no longer be any copyright protection for computer software. It should be exclusively done by patent protection."
6% picked this
Correct
Both the algorithms and the
Why this is right
The specific way an algorithm is expressed is covered by copyright protection. Both the author and the patent proponents are happy about that (they both want to protect the software developer's intellectual property and incentive for innovating). Where the author disagrees with the patent proponents is that he does not think the underlying algorithms should be patented, comparing them to a general principle like "wind can be used to harness energy". Meanwhile, the patent proponents think of designing an algorithm more like designing a new process, which can be patented. So whereas the author would say "only the specific expression of ideas should be protected", the patent proponents would say "both the algorithm and the specific expression of ideas should be protected (the former by patent law and the latter by copyright)."
Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
57% picked this
As the number of available
Out of Scope
The patent proponents are fueled by the fear that copycat programming is on the rise / is a dire problem in need of a big systemic change. That's why they're urging the extension of patent protection to software. This answer is making it sound like copycat programming isn't something to worry about. It's a declining trend.
1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free