Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT157 S1 P3 Q14 ExplanationUnderwater Cultural Heritage

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A is from a newspaper article. Passage B is from UNESCO’s 1999 Draft Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage.

Passage A A North American company that found what is believed to be the HMS Sussex during expeditions in the Mediterranean from 1998 to 2001 has signed an agreement with the British government, which owns the Sussex, to raise what may be history’s richest sunken treasure and to split the proceeds. The in gold coins lost with the Sussex in a storm in 1694.

As robots, sonar, and other technologically advanced gear have opened the deepest oceans to exploration and recovery, governments have begun asserting ownership over their sunken vessels. But governments often lack the money and skills to retrieve cultural riches and, until now, there had been no legal precedent for a private company to treasure hunting and allow nations to oversee the recovery of their lost fleets.

The company, which is funding the venture, agrees with British historians that the ship carried coins, most likely gold, worth £1 million in 1694. The US$4 billion figure is the coins’ theoretical value if sold to collectors. The agreement calls for archaeological integrity—a difficult technical feat at such depths and a goal archaeological value than coins, which it allows to be sold to help pay for the project.

Passage B “Underwater cultural heritage” (UCH) means all traces of human existence that have been partially, totally, or periodically least 100 years.

1. The protection of UCH is best achieved through in situ (original site) preservation, which should be considered as the first option. Accordingly, activities directed at UCH shall be authorized by the competent authority of the concerned State to knowledge, protection, and/or enhancement of UCH.

2. The commercial exploitation of UCH for trade, sale, barter, or speculation...is fundamentally incompatible with the protection of the UCH.

3. Activities directed at UCH shall not adversely impact UCH more than is necessary for the project;

4. must use nondestructive techniques and prospection and limited sampling in preference to recovery of objects. If excavation is necessary for the purpose of scientific studies, the methods and techniques used must be to the preservation of the remains;

5. shall avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains sites;

6. shall be strictly regulated to ensure proper recording of historical, archaeological information.

7. Public access to conduct activities relating to UCH that are nonintrusive (such as photography) be encouraged.

What this question is testing

Inference

Goal

Find the safest inference from Passage A's stated facts.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following is most strongly implied by

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct52% picked this

    A government’s property rights in a ship that sank several centuries ago are not forfeited merely by their not having salvaged the

    Why this is right

    Passage A states the British government "owns the Sussex," a ship that sank in 1694 -- over 300 years ago. The government never salvaged it during the intervening centuries, yet it still claims and exercises ownership rights. This strongly implies that property rights in sunken vessels are not forfeited by failure to salvage.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Unsupported8% picked this

    Governments have a legal obligation to ensure the archaeological integrity of efforts to salvage or

    Passage A does not state or imply that governments have a legal obligation to ensure archaeological integrity. The agreement voluntarily includes this provision, but no legal requirement is mentioned.

  3. Unsupported28% picked this

    Gold coins salvaged from an old shipwreck should not be regarded as archaeologically significant cultural property if they can be used to fund the

    Passage A reports that the agreement allows coins to be sold, but it does not imply that gold coins should not be regarded as archaeologically significant. The distinction is between cultural items and coins, not between significant and insignificant artifacts.

  4. Out of Scope6% picked this

    If neither the original owner of a sunken ship nor any legitimate heirs of the owner still exist, the ownership of that ship devolves

    Passage A never addresses what happens when neither the original owner nor legitimate heirs exist. The Sussex is owned by the British government, so this scenario is irrelevant to the passage.

  5. Unsupported7% picked this

    When there is no salvage agreement between the owner of a sunken ship and some other party, then freelance treasure hunters have a legal

    Passage A states this agreement "could end the days of freelance treasure hunting," implying freelance hunters currently operate. But the passage does not imply they have a legal right to do so -- only that no legal framework previously existed to stop them.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free