Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT157 S1 P3 Q15 ExplanationUnderwater Cultural Heritage

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsStrengthenLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A is from a newspaper article. Passage B is from UNESCO’s 1999 Draft Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage.

Passage A A North American company that found what is believed to be the HMS Sussex during expeditions in the Mediterranean from 1998 to 2001 has signed an agreement with the British government, which owns the Sussex, to raise what may be history’s richest sunken treasure and to split the proceeds. The in gold coins lost with the Sussex in a storm in 1694.

As robots, sonar, and other technologically advanced gear have opened the deepest oceans to exploration and recovery, governments have begun asserting ownership over their sunken vessels. But governments often lack the money and skills to retrieve cultural riches and, until now, there had been no legal precedent for a private company to treasure hunting and allow nations to oversee the recovery of their lost fleets.

The company, which is funding the venture, agrees with British historians that the ship carried coins, most likely gold, worth £1 million in 1694. The US$4 billion figure is the coins’ theoretical value if sold to collectors. The agreement calls for archaeological integrity—a difficult technical feat at such depths and a goal archaeological value than coins, which it allows to be sold to help pay for the project.

Passage B “Underwater cultural heritage” (UCH) means all traces of human existence that have been partially, totally, or periodically least 100 years.

1. The protection of UCH is best achieved through in situ (original site) preservation, which should be considered as the first option. Accordingly, activities directed at UCH shall be authorized by the competent authority of the concerned State to knowledge, protection, and/or enhancement of UCH.

2. The commercial exploitation of UCH for trade, sale, barter, or speculation...is fundamentally incompatible with the protection of the UCH.

3. Activities directed at UCH shall not adversely impact UCH more than is necessary for the project;

4. must use nondestructive techniques and prospection and limited sampling in preference to recovery of objects. If excavation is necessary for the purpose of scientific studies, the methods and techniques used must be to the preservation of the remains;

5. shall avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains sites;

6. shall be strictly regulated to ensure proper recording of historical, archaeological information.

7. Public access to conduct activities relating to UCH that are nonintrusive (such as photography) be encouraged.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Goal

Find the answer that gives both the convention and the critics ammunition against commercial archaeology.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following would, if true, strengthen the position of the draft convention in passage B, as well as that of the critics of

Answer choices, explained

  1. Out of Scope6% picked this

    Many archaeological sites require visitors to pay a fee for the privilege of viewing

    Charging visitors fees to view a site has no bearing on whether selling artifacts is harmful. This addresses museum economics, not the commercial exploitation of recovered artifacts.

  2. Correct67% picked this

    Selling artifacts that have substantial archaeological value encourages the looting of archaeological

    Why this is right

    If selling valuable artifacts encourages looting by nonscientists, that directly supports both the critics' claim that sales inhibit scholarship and the convention's stance that commercial exploitation is incompatible with UCH protection.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Weakens7% picked this

    Most of the archaeological artifacts displayed in major museums were contributed

    If museums depend on private collectors for artifacts, that suggests the commercial market supports public display rather than inhibiting it -- weakening the critics' position.

  4. Weakens8% picked this

    While nonscientists often work on archaeological sites, they are under the supervision

    If nonscientists work under professional supervision, that suggests for-profit archaeology can maintain standards -- weakening the critics' concern about inadequate scholarship.

  5. Out of Scope11% picked this

    The excavation and recovery of valuable cargo and artifacts from shipwrecks almost always involves

    Disturbing human remains is addressed in passage B's principle 5, but neither the critics in passage A nor the convention's anti-sale stance are specifically concerned with human remains. This does not strengthen the shared anti-commercial position.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free