Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT157 S1 P3 Q13 ExplanationUnderwater Cultural Heritage

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A is from a newspaper article. Passage B is from UNESCO’s 1999 Draft Convention on Underwater Cultural Heritage.

Passage A A North American company that found what is believed to be the HMS Sussex during expeditions in the Mediterranean from 1998 to 2001 has signed an agreement with the British government, which owns the Sussex, to raise what may be history’s richest sunken treasure and to split the proceeds. The in gold coins lost with the Sussex in a storm in 1694.

As robots, sonar, and other technologically advanced gear have opened the deepest oceans to exploration and recovery, governments have begun asserting ownership over their sunken vessels. But governments often lack the money and skills to retrieve cultural riches and, until now, there had been no legal precedent for a private company to treasure hunting and allow nations to oversee the recovery of their lost fleets.

The company, which is funding the venture, agrees with British historians that the ship carried coins, most likely gold, worth £1 million in 1694. The US$4 billion figure is the coins’ theoretical value if sold to collectors. The agreement calls for archaeological integrity—a difficult technical feat at such depths and a goal archaeological value than coins, which it allows to be sold to help pay for the project.

Passage B “Underwater cultural heritage” (UCH) means all traces of human existence that have been partially, totally, or periodically least 100 years.

1. The protection of UCH is best achieved through in situ (original site) preservation, which should be considered as the first option. Accordingly, activities directed at UCH shall be authorized by the competent authority of the concerned State to knowledge, protection, and/or enhancement of UCH.

2. The commercial exploitation of UCH for trade, sale, barter, or speculation...is fundamentally incompatible with the protection of the UCH.

3. Activities directed at UCH shall not adversely impact UCH more than is necessary for the project;

4. must use nondestructive techniques and prospection and limited sampling in preference to recovery of objects. If excavation is necessary for the purpose of scientific studies, the methods and techniques used must be to the preservation of the remains;

5. shall avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains sites;

6. shall be strictly regulated to ensure proper recording of historical, archaeological information.

7. Public access to conduct activities relating to UCH that are nonintrusive (such as photography) be encouraged.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Goal

Find the project that does not meet the 100-year rule.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
13.

Which one of the following projects would most clearly NOT fall within the scope of the provisions specified

Answer choices, explained

  1. Within Scope25% picked this

    The recovery of a sunken eighteenth-century Spanish treasure fleet by private,

    An eighteenth-century Spanish fleet would have been underwater for well over 100 years, placing it squarely within UCH as defined by passage B.

  2. Within Scope3% picked this

    The recovery of a nineteenth-century shipwreck of unknown origin in one of

    A nineteenth-century shipwreck has been underwater for over 100 years, so it falls within the convention's definition of UCH regardless of its unknown origin.

  3. Within Scope4% picked this

    The recovery of underwater artifacts from the ruins of a long-submerged ancient city built when sea levels were much

    A long-submerged ancient city would easily satisfy both the "traces of human existence" and "at least 100 years" requirements of passage B's UCH definition.

  4. Correct60% picked this

    The recovery of the cargo of a privately owned merchant ship that sank in 1970 off

    Why this is right

    A ship that sank in 1970 has been underwater for only about 56 years, falling short of passage B's 100-year threshold for UCH.

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Within Scope8% picked this

    The recovery of prehistoric cultural artifacts recently uncovered by the damming and rerouting of

    Prehistoric artifacts that were recently uncovered by river rerouting would have been underwater for far more than 100 years and constitute traces of human existence, placing them within the convention's definition of UCH.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free