Essayist: Commitment to relationships or careers is commonly held to be virtuous.
Conclusion
All commitments should be seen as morally neutral.
Evidence (after all)
Something that one is committed to might be either good or bad.
Commitment to a relationship that benefits none of the people involved deserves no praise.
Often, commitment is nothing more than involvement that has outlasted its original justification.
Evaluate
We're trying to conclude that all commitments "should be seen as morally neutral", so we will want an answer structured like,
________ → should be seen as morally neutral
What will go in the trigger spot? Well what do we know about all commitments?
The only premise that seems to apply to all commitments is the idea that what you might be committed to could be good or bad.
(The other premises are about some hypothetical commitments or about a type of commitment that often happens).
Goal
So let's look for something like,