Reading Comprehension

PT157 · S4 · P2 · Q8 Wisdom of Markets

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage AMarkets, such as stock exchanges, distill the collective wisdom of millions of individuals into a single number, and they do so with amazing efficiency.

Topic

The accuracy and limitations of markets—especially prediction markets—when it comes to gathering and reflecting information.

Framework

Present Debate

Main Point

While markets (including prediction markets) can efficiently aggregate information and often make accurate forecasts, they are not infallible and ultimately reflect the prevailing opinion at a given time rather than any guaranteed insight into the future. **Most Valuable Sentences:** - Passage A: - Passage B:

P1 (Passage A): Markets as Efficient Information Gatherers

Markets (unlike committees or polls) efficiently turn the opinions and knowledge of many individuals into useful predictions or prices, rewarding those who have correct insights.

P2 (Passage A): Example—Prediction Markets

Describes the structure and success of engineered markets like the Iowa Electronic Markets, which use actual money to encourage accurate predictions—sometimes even outperforming polls.

P3 (Passage A): How Markets Rapidly Learn

Explains, via an experiment, how markets can quickly reflect the knowledge of even a small number of informed participants, making everyone act as though they are "in the know" by watching price movements.

8.

Both passages are primarily concerned with answering which one of the following questions?

  1. Is collective wisdom more reliable

    Too Narrow

    The fact that this doesn't reference the main character, markets, is an instant red-flag. Even if tried to relate this question to the discussion of markets, neither passage was comparing market wisdom to the reliability of individual judgment.

    2% picked this

  2. What can be learned from

    Too Narrow

    Passage B never talks about stock markets specifically, just markets in the general sense. Even Passage A is centered around talking about markets, not the stock market. Its very first sentence says "Markets, such as stock exchanges". Even if this were switched to "markets" rather than "stock markets", it would still probably lose out to (C). The passage was more about what can be learned from markets, even if there's no movement to a given "stock". What does it say about something if the market value of it is high vs. low? This answer makes it sound more like it's about "what does the movement tell us"?

    10% picked this

  3. Correct

    Can markets be used to

    Why this is right

    Passage A would answer with a resounding YES, since she thinks that markets distill the collective wisdom of millions. Markets reward people who are right (i.e. they have a connection to objective reality). Passage B would answer this with a NO, since he things that markets are fallible, markets can send the wrong message for long periods of time (based on what the eventual outcome turns out to be), and markets just give you a snapshot of majority opinion which is sometimes right / sometimes wrong.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    79% picked this

  4. Are opinions more likely to

    Too Narrow

    The fact that this doesn't reference the main character, markets, is an instant red-flag. Both passages seem to agree that opinions are more likely to be true when people stake money on them (Passage A's 1st paragraph / Passage B's 3rd paragraph), but for neither passage would we say that this was the question the passage was primarily concerned with. Again, both passages were about markets, and so the primary concern needs to be about markets.

    6% picked this

  5. Are markets that are engineered

    Too Narrow

    Neither passage compares the efficiency of stock markets to election-predicting markets. Passage A seems to think of all markets as being efficient. Passage B never even discusses stock markets.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free