Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT157 S3 Q6 ExplanationWinchester Township cannot afford to keep

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Winchester Township cannot afford to keep its several small branch libraries supplied with a wide selection of current books. However, if the branch libraries were closed, then Winchester could afford to open one large library, which could carry broader and more current selections. Thus, Winchester would small branch libraries and opening one larger, well-supplied library.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Conclusion

Close all the little libraries, build one big one. Problem solved — or so the argument claims.

Evidence

The branch libraries cannot afford good books. A single large library could. More books, more current titles, happier residents. At least, that is the theory.

Evaluate

There is a small problem with the "one big library fixes everything" plan: people have to actually get there. Multiple small libraries mean most residents have one nearby. One large library might be a trek for the majority of the town. A library with the world's best book collection does not help anyone who cannot reach it. The argument treats "better books" as the only thing residents need, ignoring the radical concept of convenience.

Goal

Find the answer that rains on the consolidation parade — most likely by pointing out that the new library would be inconveniently located.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Opposite (if anything)1% picked this

    Many Winchester residents never use the branch libraries because of the irregular hours

    If many residents never use the branch libraries because of irregular hours, this actually supports closing them. Residents who are not using the branches have nothing to lose from their closure and might gain access to a larger library with more consistent hours. This answer strengthens the argument for consolidation by suggesting that the branch libraries are already failing to serve some residents.

  2. Opposite (if anything)1% picked this

    Most Winchester residents have complained about the selection of books at

    If residents are already complaining about the book selection at branch libraries, this supports the argument for a larger library with better selection. The complaints validate the argument's premise that branch libraries are inadequately supplied and suggest residents would welcome a better-stocked alternative.

  3. Correct88% picked this

    The only possible site for a new library is not readily accessible to

    Why this is right

    This answer identifies the key unintended consequence of consolidation. If the only possible site for a new library is not readily accessible to most Winchester residents, then the improved book selection becomes irrelevant for the majority of the community. A library that people cannot easily reach does not meet their needs regardless of how well-stocked it is. The branch libraries, despite their limited selections, at least provided convenient local access. Replacing accessible but poorly supplied libraries with an inaccessible but well-supplied library could easily leave residents worse off overall.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope5% picked this

    It would cost Winchester a significant amount of money to build

    The argument already accounts for the financial dimension by stating that closing branches would allow Winchester to afford a larger library. The word "significant" does not tell us whether the cost would exceed the savings from closing branch libraries. Without information about whether the cost exceeds available resources, this answer does not clearly weaken the argument.

  5. Too Weak5% picked this

    Each of Winchester’s branch libraries attempts to cater to the tastes of the residents of

    The phrase "attempts to cater" significantly weakens this answer. If each branch library merely attempts to serve the entire township's tastes, that does not mean it succeeds. The branch libraries could be attempting and failing to meet diverse tastes, which would actually support the argument for a larger, better-stocked library. This answer would be stronger if it said each branch library successfully caters to local neighborhood tastes.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free