Reading Comprehension

PT153 · S4 · P1 · Q7 Forest Preservation

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Forests are among the world’s most valuable resources, both in a narrowly economic sense and in a broader, ecological sense.

Topic

Forests’ value, common misconceptions about their ecological functions, and analysis of claims about preservation versus economic use.

Framework

Present Debate (the passage examines various claims about forests and weighs arguments on both sides)

Main Point

In order to make wise policy decisions about preserving forests, we need a grounded understanding of both economic and ecological claims, and not all common arguments (like the oxygen myth) hold up, though biodiversity preservation remains a strong case for conservation. The Most Valuable Sentence: (End of P1)

P1: Forests’ Value and the Need for Clear Debate

Forests are crucial for both the economy and ecology, providing products and environmental benefits, but rational policy requires strong understanding of both sides of the conservation argument, especially regarding common claims about oxygen and biodiversity.

P2: The Oxygen Myth

Despite the common belief that forests are essential for oxygen production, this is a myth—forests on the whole do not create a net increase in oxygen because the decomposition cycle balances things out.

P3: Biodiversity and Its Importance

Preserving forests may be important for guarding undiscovered plants that could aid medicine, and many see protecting biodiversity as a moral or intrinsic good, regardless of economic utility.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information in the passage?

Some diseases that affect plants
Out of Scope: diseases affecting plants
The passage never mentions any diseases that affect plants. In the third paragraph, it says that we suspect that some plants within tropical rain forests may have unique "disease-fighting" properties. But that's saying that a plant will have some chemical in it (possibly something it uses as a natural pesticide to discourage insects) that the drug-making industry finds useful (a special amino acid that neutralizes typhoid fever).
23% picked this
Correct
Deforestation can have negative effects
Why this is right
This is supported in the first paragraph's second sentence: forests provide recreations, reduce flooding, and prevent soil erosion that clogs rivers with silt. If having forests leads to rivers being less clogged with silt, then deforestation could lead to rivers being more clogged with silt. If a river is clogged with silt, then water-based transportation will have a harder time traveling down that river. Is this one of the biggest, most obnoxious reaches a correct answer has performed? Yes, I'd say this probably ranks top 20. It's a good reminder about how hard and obscure questions can be that have question stems like - what can be inferred - what does the passage suggest - which is most supported Students often assume/hope that these questions are still testing big ideas. Once in a while they are, but at least as frequently the correct answer is just a derivable truth from some random little detail in the passage. We'd have to ask ourselves questions in order to find the appropriate support, like, "Did they tell us anything about deforestation? Did we ever talk about water-based transportation?" In many cases, having that curious, agnostic mindset is good enough to help us go research possible supporting text, at which point we might see the little detail that allows us to support the correct answer. But in this case, "water-based transportation" feels so out of scope, it takes a heroic effort to figure out where in the passage to even look for this randomness.
Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
42% picked this
There are more commercial plantations
Contradicted
The final paragraph is telling us that commercial plantations are a tiny minority of forests. The final sentence of the passage is saying that plantations make up just 3 percent of the world's forest area.
3% picked this
There are more species of
Out of Scope: endangered
This answer is appealing to our common sense, since tropical rain forests have such rich, voluminous density of species that one would assume that they have more species in any category than other types of forest. But there's no support for this in the passage. We certainly don't talk about internationally recognized endangered species.
22% picked this
Commercial plantations produce goods that
Too Strong: rarely
Commercial plantations are discussed in the final paragraph, and nothing in that paragraph ever mentions where the goods are sold. If we say that they are rarely sold in the country where they're produced, then we're claiming that "at least 51% of those goods are exported to other countries". There's no information resembling that at all.
10% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free