Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S1 P1 Q2 ExplanationMotion Pictures

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocate DetailHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Most writings on the subject of motion pictures, including those scrutinizing the structural characteristics, aesthetic qualities, and effects of motion pictures on audiences, have traditionally been relatively abstract and have not considered what a filmʼs audiences actually see. In fact, various external factors intervene between the filmmakerʼs intent of a film and, consequently, the viewerʼs perception of it.

In the process of distribution, a film can be mutilated in many ways. The damage is most obvious when films in one language are shown to audiences that speak a different language. Subtitling may be simply incompetent, full of mistakes, or used for actual censorship. Dubbing—a significantly more profound intervention—can be even original titles, a practice that often creates false expectations and distorts the works intent.

When a film is shown on television or video, it suffers the most extensive deformations. In addition to causing a loss of image size and definition, current mass-market television and video technology is harmful in other ways. These intrusions include advertisements that break the intended continuity, the superimposition of images—such as station obtain more commercial time, are almost imperceptible but nonetheless detrimental to the integrity of a film.

It seems that audiences and even most film critics have tacitly accepted this situation—they rarely speak about it. This may be partly because of the special nature of film. In many other arts it is obvious that reproductions of a work are not the work itself, and they are not treated as expectations with regard to the more or less faulty versions that are often available to viewers.

What this question is testing

Locate Detail

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

The author distinguishes film from at least some other art forms with

Answer choices, explained

  1. Out of Scope2% picked this

    extent of public reliance on professional analyses

    Out of Scope: reliance on pro analysis There's nothing in this Proof Window about either art form relying on professional analysis.

  2. Correct85% picked this

    possibility of creating multiple instances of the

    Why this is right

    This is talking about what the Proof Window is talking about --- with other forms of art, it's obvious that reproductions of the work are not the work itself. With films, because it's exactly reproducible, each print is in fact another instance of the work itself. With films, it's possible to create multiple instances. With these other art forms, it's not possible. (the strength of "not possible" might scare us, but this is the most supportable answer. If reproductions in these art forms are obviously not the work itself, it suggests that it's not the type of thing that can be actually replicated very well at all)

    Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope: damage through aging1% picked this

    susceptibility of the artwork to damage through environmental factors

    Nothing in this Proof Window says anything about environmental damage and aging.

  4. Out of Window: control of presentation10% picked this

    degree of control that a work?s creator has over the conditions of

    We talked a lot about the myriad ways that films will be presented that betray the filmmaker's intentions (out of their control), but this moment of the passage that the question stem is pointing us to doesn't say anything about this. The author never distinguishes film from other forms of art on this level.

  5. Out of Scope: complex methods2% picked this

    complexity of the methods used to provide public access

    This window of text, and the passage overall, doesn't really talk about how complex the method of providing public access to film, or other works of art, is.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free