Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S4 P1 Q3 Explanation

Forest Preservation

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsFive QuestionsScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Forests are among the world’s most valuable resources, both in a narrowly economic sense and in a broader, ecological sense. Besides yielding over 5,000 commercial products that contribute some 2 percent to the world’s total economic production, forests provide recreation, reduce flooding, and prevent soil erosion that clogs rivers with silt. However, oxygen-renewing capacity of forests, the other about the role of forests in preserving biodiversity—merit special scrutiny.

Some consider the tropical rain forests of the Brazilian Amazon region “the lungs of the earth,” claiming that the foliage absorbs so much carbon dioxide and produces so much oxygen that the atmosphere would be depleted of the latter if these forests ceased to exist. But this belief is largely a myth. the trees produced. In net terms, therefore, forests neither produce nor consume oxygen.

Another claim made is that the preservation of biodiversity, the globe’s profusion of plant and animal species, requires a stricter policy to conserve forest, especially tropical rain forest. For one thing, many scientists believe that some tropical rain-forest plant species yet to be discovered may contain agents with unique disease-fighting properties. These diversity—or, at least, that to do so would be a noninstrumental, that is, an intrinsic, good.

Actually, careful review of official statistics suggests that tropical deforestation is not occurring as fast as has often been claimed. Some existing forests, however, do consist of commercial plantations, of which some people are highly critical. Such plantations tend to contain significantly fewer plant and animal species than natural forest. However, since of official data shows that plantations make up just 3 percent of the world’s forest area.

What this question is testing

Five Questions

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

The information in the passage answers which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: percentage1% picked this

    What percentage of the world’s tropical rain forest is located in the

    If we scan/search for "Brazilian", that specific region is only discussed in the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph, and it doesn't indicate what % of the world's tropical rain forest resides there.

  2. Out of Scope: total quantity8% picked this

    How many products are derived from plants grown on

    Can you imagine answering this question in real life? It would be impossible, right? You'd have to know every single plant grown on every single commercial plantation throughout the world, and then you'd have to know every product that is made out of any of these plants. Since no one in the real world could ever answer this question, clearly the passage wouldn't have. (If it said "approximately", that's a more feasible question to ask). Commercial plantations are mentioned in the final paragraph, but there is no number offered for "total # of products derived from commercial plantation plants".

  3. Correct86% picked this

    By means of what process do plants

    Why this is right

    If we scan/search for "oxygen", we'll find it mentioned several times, once at the end of the 1st paragraph and four times throughout the 2nd paragraph. One of those references in the 2nd paragraph says "trees do produce oxygen by photosynthesis". So, choice (C), plants produce oxygen by the process of photosynthesis. Some of us might be thinking: - they said trees, this says plants - how do we know a tree is a plant? (common sense) - how do we know that just because trees produce oxygen by photosynthesis, that other plants produce it the same way? That 2nd question does seem like it stretches the available text, but again it's a very common sense thought, because we know that central to your identity as a plant is photosynthesis. Moreover, if some plants (such as trees) use process X to make oxygen while other plants use process Y, then it would be illogical to phrase a question as "By means of what process (singular) do (all) plants produce oxygen?" If they have differing means, then we wouldn't ask it that way.

    Skill tested: Five Questions · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope: produce more oxygen2% picked this

    What measures, if any, could be taken to help existing forests produce more oxygen than

    As we discussed with (C), the concept of 'oxygen' shows up at the end of the 1st and throughout the 2nd paragraph. All we learn from that area is that the overall life cycle of a tree is pretty oxygen neutral. So whether we had more trees / fewer trees, it wouldn't produce more oxygen. And that's all we hear about oxygen. So we have no idea what ways, if any, exist that could help forests produce more oxygen than they currently do.

  5. Out of Scope4% picked this

    Do trees in tropical rain forests absorb more carbon dioxide than do other

    Out of Scope: absorb more Relative vs. Absolute We only ever talk about trees (including those in tropical rain forests) absorbing carbon dioxide, using yes/no absolute language. We have no way to make any comparative claims about whether certain types of trees absorb more / less CO2 than do other types of vegetation. Absorption appears only once, in the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free