Biologists are mistaken in thinking that the fossil record provides direct evidence of the course of human evolution.
Conclusion
Biologists are mistaken in thinking that the fossil record provides direct evidence of the course of human evolution.
rephrase: The fossil records does not provide direct evidence of the course of human evolution.
Intermediate Conclusion
There's no way to objectively interpret a fossil.
Evidence
The traits we choose to use to classify the fossil always reflect the model that the paleontologist wants to test (such as classifying 'pelvis' as a human trait only happens because our model involves the idea that bipedalism --i.e. walking on two legs, not four -- distinguishes humans from apes).
Evaluate
Whenever we do Main Conclusion, we remind ourselves of the two prevailing trends for where they attempt to hide the conclusion:
- 30% of them are found in the first sentence - 65% of them are found in some Pivot / Rebuttal sentence
In this case, the first sentence was a Rebuttal: "biologists are mistaken". When a Main Conclusion paragraph opens with the author's opinion, that's almost always the Main Conclusion, which the rest of the paragraph seeks to support.
The second sentence begins with an Intermediate Conclusion. The colon, ":" indicates that the 2nd half of the sentence serves as support for the first half.
Goal
As always, on Main Conclusion, our goal is just to match the meaning of the claim we identified as the conclusion.
So let's find an answer that sounds like .