Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S2 Q11 ExplanationUnlike other mechanical devices

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Unlike other mechanical devices, the clock did not evolve from the simple to the complex. The earliest clocks were also the most complicated. This is because early clocks were used primarily to predict astronomical phenomena, though the mechanisms they used for this purpose incidentally enabled one functions became more important and the astronomical ones diminished.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Too Strong: no use4% picked this

    Present-day clocks are of no use in the prediction of

    The last sentence only says that "astronomical functions have diminished in importance", not totally disappeared.

  2. Unknown Comparison5% picked this

    The mechanisms used to predict astronomical phenomena in at least some clocks were more complicated than most more recent

    We can't compare "astronomical mechanisms" before to astronomical mechanisms now. We can compare clocks then to clocks now, but to the extent that clocks have preserved any of the astronomical mechanisms, those individual mechanisms might be the same. The clocks today might be simpler by just containing fewer mechanisms used to predict astronomical phenomena.

  3. Unknown Comparison4% picked this

    Clocks used only for keeping time do not differ appreciably in

    We can compare clocks from before to clocks now, but we can't say something as strong as "clocks used only to keep time are pretty much all equally complex".

  4. Correct83% picked this

    The mechanisms that the earliest clocks used to predict astronomical phenomena were more complicated than the mechanisms used for timekeeping functions

    Why this is right

    This seems to reinforce the story we told, that as clocks went from primarily predicting astronomical phenomena to primarily keeping time, they went from more complex to more simple. The internal logic of that progression is that it's simpler to keep time than to predict astronomical functions.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope: interest in predicting5% picked this

    Interest in predicting astronomical phenomena has declined steadily since the invention of the

    We're only learning about the evolving functions of clocks. We might be able to say that interest in having a clock predict astronomical phenomena has declined, but we can't say that overall societal/scientific interest in predicting astronomical phenomena has steadily declined.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free