Reading Comprehension

PT153 · S1 · P1 · Q1 Motion Pictures

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Most writings on the subject of motion pictures, including those scrutinizing the structural characteristics, aesthetic qualities, and effects of motion pictures on audiences, have traditionally been relatively abstract and have not considered what a filmʼs audiences actually see.

Topic

The impact of distribution and presentation on the integrity and perception of motion pictures.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The way films are distributed, translated, edited, and especially shown on television or video often alters the intended experience, yet this is rarely acknowledged—creating problems for both audiences and critics. Most Valuable Sentence: The last paragraph, especially:

P1: The Usual Approach Overlooks the Audience’s Real Experience

Most discussions and analyses of movies ignore what audiences actually see, focusing too much on abstract qualities. But lots of outside factors come between what the filmmaker intends and what the audience ultimately experiences.

P2: Specific Ways Distribution Alters Films

Distribution can seriously change films, especially with foreign films. Subtitles and dubbing can introduce errors, censorship, or big changes. Sometimes films are re-edited or given new titles that misrepresent their original intent.

P3: Television and Video Transformations

When movies are shown on TV or video, they're altered even more. Not only do you lose picture quality and size, but you get commercials, on-screen graphics, and interruptions that mess with the flow. Other changes, like slightly speeding up a film to allow more ads, are subtle but still damaging.

In the passage, the author primarily attempts to

provide evidence against a claim
Out of Scope
Out of Scope: evidence against a claim The author seems to have her own agenda. She's here to complain about the ways in which we tolerate alterations of film. The central purpose of this passage is not reacting against some claim. (This answer feels more like a Challenge Position passage, but this passage seems more like a Problem w/o Solution).
2% picked this
establish that changing the materials
Unsupported Causal Claim Unrelated to Goal
This looks nothing like Call Out a Problem. It feels more like Make a Recommendation. Where in the passage did the author say that "if filmmakers change the materials they're using, it would enhance public appreciation of film"? The author's agenda was to enhance film appreciation (by the public and by critics) by encouraging us to preserve the original film as intended. There's nothing about "changing materials".
0% picked this
refute a commonly held view
Out of Scope: refute a view
The author seems to have her own agenda. She's here to complain about the ways in which we tolerate alterations of film. The central purpose of this passage is not reacting against some view. (This answer feels more like a Challenge Position passage, but this passage seems more like a Problem w/o Solution).
1% picked this
Correct
describe a problem that is
Why this is right
"Describe a problem" certainly aligns with our Problem w/o Solution framework. The author wrote this passage to complain about the ways in which we tolerate alterations of film. Is that a problem that's "generally overlooked"? Yes! The very first sentence says that "most writings have not considered what audiences actually see" (i.e. they haven't considered that what audiences see is often an adulterated version of the original film)
Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
94% picked this
explain why a particular art
Out of Scope
Out of Scope: explain why it's criticized The author is here to complain about the ways in which we tolerate alterations of film. This answer sounds like she was offering a Causal Explanation for why film is the target of negative criticism. There's no part of the passage where it sounds like "the art form of film" is negatively criticized. The closest we get to that is in the second to last sentence, where the author suggests that "since we ignore these alterations that have taken place before an audience sees the film, we are often unfairly subjecting films to critical judgment based on some altered form, not the actual work the filmmaker created and intended." But that has nothing to do with saying that "the art form of film is the target of negative criticism".
3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free