Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S2 Q3 ExplanationFood columnist: Only 2 percent of imported seafood

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsEvaluate

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Food columnist: Only 2 percent of imported seafood is subjected to health safety inspections. So if you want to increase the likelihood that the seafood you buy will should buy only domestic seafood.

What this question is testing

Evaluate

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
3.

The answer to which one of the following questions would most help in evaluating the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Too Extreme2% picked this

    Do the health safety inspections detect all health risks present in the seafood

    Too Extreme: all Unrelated to Goal: domestic vs. imported The fact that this isn't a question that helps us assess the comparative risk between domestic vs. imported means it's useless to us. There isn't any answer here that would weaken. We could say, "no, health safety inspections don't detect every single health risk present", but that wouldn't give us a way to argue that imported seafood is at least as safe as domestic seafood. It would be a fact that applies evenly to both of them.

  2. Unrelated to Goal: domestic vs. imported0% picked this

    What kinds of health risks can

    The fact that this isn't a question that helps us assess the comparative risk between domestic vs. imported means it's useless to us. There isn't any answer here that would weaken. We could say, "one health risk that seafood can pose is salmonella poisoning", but that wouldn't give us a way to argue that imported seafood is at least as safe as domestic seafood. It would be a fact that applies evenly to both of them.

  3. Out of Scope: other than seafood1% picked this

    What percentage of imported food other than seafood is subjected to

    This argument is only about comparing the risk of domestic seafood to imported seafood. Other types of food are irrelevant.

  4. Out of Scope: other than seafood1% picked this

    What percentage of domestic food other than seafood is subjected to

    This argument is only about comparing the risk of domestic seafood to imported seafood. Other types of food are irrelevant.

  5. Correct97% picked this

    What percentage of domestic seafood is subjected to health

    Why this is right

    This would help us compare domestic seafood to imported seafood. We already know what % of imported seafood gets inspected (only 2%). The author is acting like a higher percentage of domestic seafood gets inspected, but she never established that this is the case. Here, we have a question that can be answered in a way that would weaken. If we said, 'Only 1% of domestic seafood is inspected", then the fact that 2% of imported seafood is inspected would allow us to argue that imported seafood is at least as safe to eat as domestic. If we had an argument that said, "Sharon is much stronger than Tom. After all, Tom can only bench press 100 lbs.", we would be like, "Okay, can Sharon bench press more than 100lbs?" And an analogous answer choice would say: (E) How much can Sharon bench press?

    Skill tested: Evaluate · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free