Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT153 S1 P1 Q4 ExplanationMotion Pictures

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsStrengthenHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Most writings on the subject of motion pictures, including those scrutinizing the structural characteristics, aesthetic qualities, and effects of motion pictures on audiences, have traditionally been relatively abstract and have not considered what a filmʼs audiences actually see. In fact, various external factors intervene between the filmmakerʼs intent of a film and, consequently, the viewerʼs perception of it.

In the process of distribution, a film can be mutilated in many ways. The damage is most obvious when films in one language are shown to audiences that speak a different language. Subtitling may be simply incompetent, full of mistakes, or used for actual censorship. Dubbing—a significantly more profound intervention—can be even original titles, a practice that often creates false expectations and distorts the works intent.

When a film is shown on television or video, it suffers the most extensive deformations. In addition to causing a loss of image size and definition, current mass-market television and video technology is harmful in other ways. These intrusions include advertisements that break the intended continuity, the superimposition of images—such as station obtain more commercial time, are almost imperceptible but nonetheless detrimental to the integrity of a film.

It seems that audiences and even most film critics have tacitly accepted this situation—they rarely speak about it. This may be partly because of the special nature of film. In many other arts it is obvious that reproductions of a work are not the work itself, and they are not treated as expectations with regard to the more or less faulty versions that are often available to viewers.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Which one of the following would, if true, most strengthen the authorʼs argument concerning any modification of a

Answer choices, explained

  1. Weakens7% picked this

    Almost all filmmakers whose work critics respect approve of the distribution of altered versions

    This answer is saying, "more than 90% of the best filmmakers approve of alterations to their film through the distribution process". So, author, you can keep complaining and objecting that these alterations are mutilating these films, but almost all of the filmmakers themselves (the ones you would care the most about) are totally fine with it.

  2. Weakens9% picked this

    Mass-market television and video technology has recently improved in its ability to present films in ways that conform

    The author is trying to sound the panic alarm about how bad it is when we modify films during distribution. She hates this practice, because it's a betrayal of the artist's vision and final product. But this is tamping down that concern, saying, "Yeah, it was worse in the past, but it's not as much of a problem any more. Nowadays, we do a better job of conforming to the filmmakers' intentions, so chill out, Author."

  3. No Impact14% picked this

    Many professional commentaries on nonfilm artworks are based on aged, mutilated, or otherwise altered versions

    If anything, this feels like a Weaken answer, but it's very weak in strength, so it has little impact overall. Our author is worried about altered versions of cinematic artworks, because it's unfair to the filmmaker for a critic to judge an altered version of the film. This answer is sort of saying, "Relax, author, this happens in a lot of fields of art, not just film. It's common for professional criticism to be based on an altered, even mutilated, version of the work."

  4. Weakens3% picked this

    Almost all viewers of films are unaware of the professional commentaries that are written

    The final sentence of the passage shows the author worrying that audiences will be given false expectations because the critic saw a different version of the film than they will see. But if, as this answer says, audiences are almost always unaware of what the critics have said, then there's no harm to fear.

  5. Correct67% picked this

    In almost every film that has a soundtrack, all parts of the soundtrack are designed by the filmmaker to contribute significantly

    Why this is right

    There's no way we could have predicted this specific answer, but it does underscore one of the author's concerns. In the middle of the 3rd paragraph, the author laments that there are sometimes "spoken announcements over parts of the soundtrack considered by programmers to be 'unimportant'." Is that really such a big deal, author? Do we really need to be concerned if the station hypes the new episode of "Young Sheldon" during the opening music of Shawshank Redemption? Yes, say the author and this answer choice: because all parts of the soundtrack are designed by the filmmaker to contribute significantly to the film's artistic value. This helps strengthen the author's case that these alterations we're doing when we modify for distribution are corrupting/mutilating the artwork.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free