Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S4 P1 Q6 ExplanationForest Preservation

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Forests are among the world’s most valuable resources, both in a narrowly economic sense and in a broader, ecological sense. Besides yielding over 5,000 commercial products that contribute some 2 percent to the world’s total economic production, forests provide recreation, reduce flooding, and prevent soil erosion that clogs rivers with silt. However, oxygen-renewing capacity of forests, the other about the role of forests in preserving biodiversity—merit special scrutiny.

Some consider the tropical rain forests of the Brazilian Amazon region “the lungs of the earth,” claiming that the foliage absorbs so much carbon dioxide and produces so much oxygen that the atmosphere would be depleted of the latter if these forests ceased to exist. But this belief is largely a myth. the trees produced. In net terms, therefore, forests neither produce nor consume oxygen.

Another claim made is that the preservation of biodiversity, the globe’s profusion of plant and animal species, requires a stricter policy to conserve forest, especially tropical rain forest. For one thing, many scientists believe that some tropical rain-forest plant species yet to be discovered may contain agents with unique disease-fighting properties. These diversity—or, at least, that to do so would be a noninstrumental, that is, an intrinsic, good.

Actually, careful review of official statistics suggests that tropical deforestation is not occurring as fast as has often been claimed. Some existing forests, however, do consist of commercial plantations, of which some people are highly critical. Such plantations tend to contain significantly fewer plant and animal species than natural forest. However, since of official data shows that plantations make up just 3 percent of the world’s forest area.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following statements about critics of commercial plantations is most consistent with the views of the author as

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct88% picked this

    Critics of commercial plantations should consider more carefully the relationships between commercial

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the author saying, "Some people are highly critical [of these plantations]. And sure, they're not as diverse as a natural forest. However, they reduce the economic pressure on true forests." The author's purpose in the final paragraph was to counter the alarmists who criticize commercial plantations. The author's stance is that these plantations aren't such a bad thing. This answer reinforces the author's Challenge Position stance by saying to her opponents, "You guys don't seem to appreciate the relationship between commercial and noncommercial (natural) forests: the commercial ones focus on making wood and wood pulp, and thus they reduce economic pressure on natural forests".

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Support Window: medical potential2% picked this

    Critics of commercial plantations do not recognize the medical potential of

    Nothing in the last paragraph ever talks about the medical potential of rainforest plants. Also, critics seem like people who DO recognize the medical potential of the rainforest. That's part of why they hate it when commercial plantations take over parts of the rainforest and replace its natural biodiversity with a specialized group of trees meant for wood and wood pulp.

  3. Out of Support Window1% picked this

    Critics of commercial plantations generally are well versed about photosynthesis and the effect on total biomass

    Out of Support Window: well versed critics Nothing in the last paragraph, where the passage talks about commercial plantations, has anything to do with how knowledgeable critics are about photosynthesis or the effect of total biomass on a natural forest. This answer also has a positive tone, which wouldn't be what expect, given that our author's purpose is to disagree with these critics.

  4. Opposite, if anything6% picked this

    Critics of commercial plantations possess an adequate understanding of the economic and biological impact of

    This answer also has a positive tone, which wouldn't be what expect, given that our author's purpose is to disagree with these critics. The author was saying that critics don't seem to appreciate the economic impact of these commercial plantations. Our author is arguing that these plantations should be tolerated because they kind of act as a pressure valve release. By letting some businesses focus their wood procuring efforts in these dedicated forest areas, it makes businesses less likely to go after natural forests. We could also just get rid of this because the last paragraph doesn't talk at all about whether critics understand the biological impact of restricting commercial plantations.

  5. Out of Support Window: global issues3% picked this

    Critics of commercial plantations often demonstrate a broad understanding of global

    Nothing in the last paragraph talks about global environmental issues (other than saying commercial plantations make up just 3% of the world's forest). This answer also has a positive tone, which wouldn't be what expect, given that our author's purpose is to disagree with these critics. Why would she say they demonstrate a broad understanding?

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free