Reading Comprehension

PT153 · S4 · P1 · Q6 Forest Preservation

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Forests are among the world’s most valuable resources, both in a narrowly economic sense and in a broader, ecological sense.

Topic

Forests’ value, common misconceptions about their ecological functions, and analysis of claims about preservation versus economic use.

Framework

Present Debate (the passage examines various claims about forests and weighs arguments on both sides)

Main Point

In order to make wise policy decisions about preserving forests, we need a grounded understanding of both economic and ecological claims, and not all common arguments (like the oxygen myth) hold up, though biodiversity preservation remains a strong case for conservation. The Most Valuable Sentence: (End of P1)

P1: Forests’ Value and the Need for Clear Debate

Forests are crucial for both the economy and ecology, providing products and environmental benefits, but rational policy requires strong understanding of both sides of the conservation argument, especially regarding common claims about oxygen and biodiversity.

P2: The Oxygen Myth

Despite the common belief that forests are essential for oxygen production, this is a myth—forests on the whole do not create a net increase in oxygen because the decomposition cycle balances things out.

P3: Biodiversity and Its Importance

Preserving forests may be important for guarding undiscovered plants that could aid medicine, and many see protecting biodiversity as a moral or intrinsic good, regardless of economic utility.

6.

Which one of the following statements about critics of commercial plantations is most consistent with the views of the author as expressed in the passage?

  1. Correct

    Critics of commercial plantations should

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the author saying, "Some people are highly critical [of these plantations]. And sure, they're not as diverse as a natural forest. However, they reduce the economic pressure on true forests." The author's purpose in the final paragraph was to counter the alarmists who criticize commercial plantations. The author's stance is that these plantations aren't such a bad thing. This answer reinforces the author's Challenge Position stance by saying to her opponents, "You guys don't seem to appreciate the relationship between commercial and noncommercial (natural) forests: the commercial ones focus on making wood and wood pulp, and thus they reduce economic pressure on natural forests".

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    89% picked this

  2. Critics of commercial plantations do

    Out of Support Window: medical potential

    Nothing in the last paragraph ever talks about the medical potential of rainforest plants. Also, critics seem like people who DO recognize the medical potential of the rainforest. That's part of why they hate it when commercial plantations take over parts of the rainforest and replace its natural biodiversity with a specialized group of trees meant for wood and wood pulp.

    1% picked this

  3. Critics of commercial plantations generally

    Out of Support Window

    Out of Support Window: well versed critics Nothing in the last paragraph, where the passage talks about commercial plantations, has anything to do with how knowledgeable critics are about photosynthesis or the effect of total biomass on a natural forest. This answer also has a positive tone, which wouldn't be what expect, given that our author's purpose is to disagree with these critics.

    1% picked this

  4. Critics of commercial plantations possess

    Opposite, if anything

    This answer also has a positive tone, which wouldn't be what expect, given that our author's purpose is to disagree with these critics. The author was saying that critics don't seem to appreciate the economic impact of these commercial plantations. Our author is arguing that these plantations should be tolerated because they kind of act as a pressure valve release. By letting some businesses focus their wood procuring efforts in these dedicated forest areas, it makes businesses less likely to go after natural forests. We could also just get rid of this because the last paragraph doesn't talk at all about whether critics understand the biological impact of restricting commercial plantations.

    5% picked this

  5. Critics of commercial plantations often

    Out of Support Window: global issues

    Nothing in the last paragraph talks about global environmental issues (other than saying commercial plantations make up just 3% of the world's forest). This answer also has a positive tone, which wouldn't be what expect, given that our author's purpose is to disagree with these critics. Why would she say they demonstrate a broad understanding?

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free