Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S3 Q10 ExplanationGiant ground sloths began disappearing

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Giant ground sloths began disappearing from the Americas about 10,000 years ago, around the time that the last ice age ended, and are now extinct worldwide. Scientists had thought that these sloths failed to adapt to climate changes, but they are now coming to believe that it was ice age ended that was responsible for the slothsʼ disappearance.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the most support for the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Weakens1% picked this

    Scientists have not found any physical evidence to support the idea that giant ground sloths

    This detracts plausibility from the idea that humans killed off the sloths.

  2. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Species of smaller tree-dwelling sloths continue to live throughout South and

    Out of Scope: other types of sloths We're only discussing the giant ground sloths. And this answer doesn't tell us whether these surviving sloths tolerate humans around. So this does nothing for the conversation.

  3. Weakens, if anything1% picked this

    Their large size made the giant ground sloths less adaptable than most

    "Less adaptable" would make it more plausible that climate change is what killed them.

  4. Unclear Impact2% picked this

    Giant ground sloths are not the only large mammals that began to disappear from the Americas

    Since we know humans arrived shortly before the end of the ice age, and the ice age ended around 10,000 years, if other big animals began to disappear around 10,000 years ago, that might be more compelling evidence for climate change than for the effect of humans. Regardless, it certainly doesn't tilt more strongly toward humans than toward climate change as the probable cause of why these large mammals are disappearing.

  5. Correct95% picked this

    One type of giant ground sloth survived on isolated islands until human beings arrived there well after

    Why this is right

    This is the classic "No Cause, No Effect" type of strengthener. These isolated islands are like "the control group" in a science experiment. They tolerated the shift in climate from before ice age through well after the last ice age. They were doing just fine until HUMANS came!

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free