Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S2 Q6 Explanation

Principle: If someone makes an error

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Strengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Principle: If someone makes an error, it is unethical for a coworker to use that error her own advantage.

Application: Because Mark used his coworker Rashmi's clients' e-mail addresses to advance his own was unethical.

What this question is testing

Principle-Strengthen

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to justify the above application

Answer choices

  1. Missing #12% picked this

    Mark had the e-mail addresses of Rashmi?s clients only because he had copied them from Rashmi?s directory while

    We can't use this principle to prove that Mark did something unethical until we know, 1. Mark's coworker made a mistake 2. Mark used that coworker's mistake to his own advantage. We were never told that Rashmi made any sort of mistake, and this answer still is not telling us that (unless we were to infer that the 'mistake' that Rashmi made was not locking up her directory while she was at lunch).

  2. Missing #11% picked this

    A coworker of Rashmi and Mark had access to Rashmi?s clients? e-mail addresses and shared

    We can't use this principle to prove that Mark did something unethical until we know, 1. Mark's coworker made a mistake 2. Mark used that coworker's mistake to his own advantage. We were never told that Rashmi made any sort of mistake, and this answer still is not telling us that (unless we were to infer that the 'mistake' that Rashmi made was trusting that her coworker who had access to her list wouldn't just go and share it with Mark).

  3. Missing #12% picked this

    Rashmi offered to help Mark develop a client base by sharing her own clients? e-mail

    We can't use this principle to prove that Mark did something unethical until we know, 1. Mark's coworker made a mistake 2. Mark used that coworker's mistake to his own advantage. We were never told that Rashmi made any sort of mistake, and this answer still is not telling us that (unless were infer that the 'mistake' that Rashmi made was offering to help Mark develop a client base). It doesn't seem unethical of Mark to accept her help, though.

  4. Correct94% picked this

    Mark had access to Rashmi?s clients? e-mail addresses only because she unintentionally left them visible in an e-mail that she sent to

    Why this is right

    We can't use this principle to prove that Mark did something unethical until we know, 1. Mark's coworker made a mistake 2. Mark used that coworker's mistake to his own advantage. We were never told that Rashmi made any sort of mistake, but this answer supplies that fact. Rashmi unintentionally (mistakenly) put the clients' emails into the visible part of an email (you've got to use that Bcc, Rashmi!) This answer, more than any other, clarifies that Rashmi made a mistake, and thus Mark used a coworker's mistake to his own advantage.

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Missing #11% picked this

    Mark happened upon a list of many of the e-mail addresses of Rashmi?s clients while

    We can't use this principle to prove that Mark did something unethical until we know, 1. Mark's coworker made a mistake 2. Mark used that coworker's mistake to his own advantage. We were never told that Rashmi made any sort of mistake, and this answer still is not telling us that. Mark just found these email addresses on his own, apparently.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free