Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT153 S1 P1 Q5 ExplanationMotion Pictures

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Most writings on the subject of motion pictures, including those scrutinizing the structural characteristics, aesthetic qualities, and effects of motion pictures on audiences, have traditionally been relatively abstract and have not considered what a filmʼs audiences actually see. In fact, various external factors intervene between the filmmakerʼs intent of a film and, consequently, the viewerʼs perception of it.

In the process of distribution, a film can be mutilated in many ways. The damage is most obvious when films in one language are shown to audiences that speak a different language. Subtitling may be simply incompetent, full of mistakes, or used for actual censorship. Dubbing—a significantly more profound intervention—can be even original titles, a practice that often creates false expectations and distorts the works intent.

When a film is shown on television or video, it suffers the most extensive deformations. In addition to causing a loss of image size and definition, current mass-market television and video technology is harmful in other ways. These intrusions include advertisements that break the intended continuity, the superimposition of images—such as station obtain more commercial time, are almost imperceptible but nonetheless detrimental to the integrity of a film.

It seems that audiences and even most film critics have tacitly accepted this situation—they rarely speak about it. This may be partly because of the special nature of film. In many other arts it is obvious that reproductions of a work are not the work itself, and they are not treated as expectations with regard to the more or less faulty versions that are often available to viewers.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which one of the following

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct82% picked this

    When shown on television—even without having been reedited and without any commercial breaks or superimposed messages—films can be

    Why this is right

    We're drawn to this answer with its "come hither" soft language: Films can be compromised to some extent when shown on TV. Are there any things we do to films shown on TV beyond the excluded categories of "re-edited / commercial breaks / superimposed messages"? Yes! The second sentence of the 3rd paragraph says, In addition to causing a loss of image size and definition, current mass-market television and video technology is harmful in other ways. That sentence implies that "loss of image size and definition" is one way in which TV technology is harmful. And 'harmful' is understood here to mean "deformations / mutilations of the artist's final product", so any harm is artistically compromising to some extent.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope1% picked this

    Films are considered by many art critics to be of questionable significance as a topic of serious scholarly

    Out of Scope: not worthy of serious analysis The author definitely thinks that art critics often fail to appreciate how the subtle changes that happen to a film before it's seen by critics are unfairly deforming the original work. But the passage never suggests that many art critics don't even consider film to be a topic of serious scholarly analysis.

  3. Contradicted10% picked this

    Because of technical limitations involved in the process of reproducing films, no reproduction of any one film can be strictly classified as

    The final paragraph says, The very nature of film makes it an exactly reproducible art form; under ideal conditions, each print is not merely a reproduction but is in fact another instance of the work itself.

  4. Too Strong: rarely have intended impact5% picked this

    Even when they are distributed in uncompromised versions, films elicit variable responses from viewers, and thus they can rarely be expected to have the

    The whole passage is talking about all the ways in which we compromise films by the time they are seen by viewers. This answer is talking about a case we really don't discuss -- what happens when viewers see the uncompromised versions. And it says a pretty strong idea for which we have no textual support: even when an audience sees the film exactly as the filmmaker intended, the aesthetic impact is rarely what the filmmaker intended.

  5. Too Strong2% picked this

    Most films do not meet the standards set by writings that analyze their structural

    Too Strong: most Out of Scope: standards set by writings This answer combines strong language, "more than 50% of films", with an unmentioned concept "the standards set by writings that analyze films". We don't know anything about what "standards" are set by writings, and we have not idea what percentage of films meet those standards.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free