Reading Comprehension

PT153 · S1 · P1 · Q5 Motion Pictures

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Most writings on the subject of motion pictures, including those scrutinizing the structural characteristics, aesthetic qualities, and effects of motion pictures on audiences, have traditionally been relatively abstract and have not considered what a filmʼs audiences actually see.

Topic

The impact of distribution and presentation on the integrity and perception of motion pictures.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The way films are distributed, translated, edited, and especially shown on television or video often alters the intended experience, yet this is rarely acknowledged—creating problems for both audiences and critics. Most Valuable Sentence: The last paragraph, especially:

P1: The Usual Approach Overlooks the Audience’s Real Experience

Most discussions and analyses of movies ignore what audiences actually see, focusing too much on abstract qualities. But lots of outside factors come between what the filmmaker intends and what the audience ultimately experiences.

P2: Specific Ways Distribution Alters Films

Distribution can seriously change films, especially with foreign films. Subtitles and dubbing can introduce errors, censorship, or big changes. Sometimes films are re-edited or given new titles that misrepresent their original intent.

P3: Television and Video Transformations

When movies are shown on TV or video, they're altered even more. Not only do you lose picture quality and size, but you get commercials, on-screen graphics, and interruptions that mess with the flow. Other changes, like slightly speeding up a film to allow more ads, are subtle but still damaging.

5.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which one of the following statements about films?

  1. Correct

    When shown on television—even without

    Why this is right

    We're drawn to this answer with its "come hither" soft language: Films can be compromised to some extent when shown on TV. Are there any things we do to films shown on TV beyond the excluded categories of "re-edited / commercial breaks / superimposed messages"? Yes! The second sentence of the 3rd paragraph says, In addition to causing a loss of image size and definition, current mass-market television and video technology is harmful in other ways. That sentence implies that "loss of image size and definition" is one way in which TV technology is harmful. And 'harmful' is understood here to mean "deformations / mutilations of the artist's final product", so any harm is artistically compromising to some extent.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    82% picked this

  2. Films are considered by many

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: not worthy of serious analysis The author definitely thinks that art critics often fail to appreciate how the subtle changes that happen to a film before it's seen by critics are unfairly deforming the original work. But the passage never suggests that many art critics don't even consider film to be a topic of serious scholarly analysis.

    1% picked this

  3. Because of technical limitations involved

    Contradicted

    The final paragraph says, The very nature of film makes it an exactly reproducible art form; under ideal conditions, each print is not merely a reproduction but is in fact another instance of the work itself.

    10% picked this

  4. Even when they are distributed

    Too Strong: rarely have intended impact

    The whole passage is talking about all the ways in which we compromise films by the time they are seen by viewers. This answer is talking about a case we really don't discuss -- what happens when viewers see the uncompromised versions. And it says a pretty strong idea for which we have no textual support: even when an audience sees the film exactly as the filmmaker intended, the aesthetic impact is rarely what the filmmaker intended.

    5% picked this

  5. Most films do not meet

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: most Out of Scope: standards set by writings This answer combines strong language, "more than 50% of films", with an unmentioned concept "the standards set by writings that analyze films". We don't know anything about what "standards" are set by writings, and we have not idea what percentage of films meet those standards.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free