Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT150 S4 P3 Q20 ExplanationDowsing

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

This passage is based on an article written

Dowsing is the practice of detecting resources or objects beneath the ground by passing handheld, inert tools such as forked sticks, pendulums, or metal rods over a terrain. For example, dowsers typically determine prospective water-well drilling locations by walking with a horizontally held forked tree branch until it becomes vertical, claiming the the strength of the pull felt by the dowser correlates with the potential well’s flow rate.

Those skeptical of dowsing’s efficacy point to the crudeness of its methods as a self-evident reason to question it. They assert that dowsers’ use of inert tools indicates that the dowsers themselves actually make subconscious determinations concerning the likely location of groundwater using clues derived from surface conditions; the tools’ movements merely expected to be ubiquitous, making it statistically unlikely that a dowsed well will be completely dry.

Proponents of dowsing point out that it involves a number of distinct techniques and contend that each of these techniques should be evaluated separately. They also note that numerous dowsing studies have been influenced by a lack of care in selecting the study population; dowsers are largely self-proclaimed and self-certified, and verifiably and hydrologists who use scientific tools such as electromagnetic sensors or seismic readings to locate groundwater.

The last two claims were corroborated during a recent and extensive study that utilized teams of the most successful dowsers, geologists, and hydrologists to locate reliable water supplies in various arid countries. Efforts were concentrated on finding groundwater in narrow, tilted fracture zones in bedrock underlying surface sediments. The teams were unfamiliar request even located a dry fracture zone, suggesting that dowsers can detect variations in subsurface conditions.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
20.

The passage provides the most support for inferring which one of the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Trap8% picked this

    Narrow, tilted fracture zones in underlying bedrock are more likely to be found in arid regions

    Unknown Comparison Out of Scope: "other regions" This is a classic trap answer in which they take something that was said "Sarah is a cheerleader. She drives a Prius." and then they create an unsupportable answer by turning it into a comparison, "Cheerleaders are more likely to drive Prius's than other types of athletes". We happened to hear that there were narrow, tilted fracture zones in these arid countries, but there's no comparative wording or way to know how prevalent such fracture zones are in non-arid regions.

  2. Too Strong8% picked this

    There are no reliable studies indicating that dowsers are consistently able to locate subsurface resources

    Too Strong: no reliable studies Out of Scope: "other subsurface resources" This is a trap answer pattern, "The only one mentioned = the only one". The author only mentioned a reliable study about groundwater, but that doesn't imply that "there are only reliable studies about groundwater".

  3. Unsupportable: different tools9% picked this

    A dowser attempting to locate a dry fracture zone would not use the same tools as a dowser

    The "dry fracture zone" part appears only in the final sentence of the passage. All we were told is that "upon request, they located a dry fracture zone". We don't have any wording that suggests they switched tools. Given that their tools senses the presence / absence of groundwater, they could seemingly locate a dry zone by using the same tool and looking for the absence of whatever they feel when they sense groundwater.

  4. Only One Mentioned = Only One24% picked this

    Geologists and hydrologists participating in the groundwater-locating study described in the final paragraph could not locate a dry

    All we were told was that the dowsers were able to locate a dry fracture zone. Just because the passage only mentions them finding a dry zone doesn't mean that "only the dowsers found a dry zone".

  5. Correct51% picked this

    The groundwater-locating study described in the final paragraph was not a

    Why this is right

    Did we ever hear about "typical" dowsing studies? Yes! In the middle of the 3rd paragraph we learn that "verifiably successful dowsers are not well represented in the typical study". So, for the study in the final paragraph, were we told that "verifiably successful dowsers are well represented?" Yes! In that study, they utilized "teams of the most successful dowsers".

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free