Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT150 S3 Q14 Explanation

Most popular historical films

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsPrinciple-Strengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Most popular historical films are not documentaries; they are dramatic presentations of historical events. Such presentations cannot present the evidence for the accuracy of what they portray. Consequently, uninformed viewers of dramatic as accurate portrayals of historical events.

What this question is testing

Principle-Strengthen

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the reasoning

Answer choices

  1. Bad Conclusion Match2% picked this

    Writers of historical dramas should attempt to provide their own distinctive insights into the meaning of the historical

    We're looking for a principle that instructs viewers on what they should / should not regard as an accurate portrayal. This principle is about what writers should do, not about how viewers should regard a portrayal.

  2. Bad Conclusion Match5% picked this

    Historical documentaries should be careful to present all the evidence when attempting to inform their

    We're looking for a principle that instructs viewers on what they should / should not regard as an accurate portrayal. This principle is about what documentaries should be careful about presenting, not about how viewers should regard a portrayal.

  3. Bad Conclusion Match11% picked this

    Dramatic presentations of historical events are better suited for educational purposes if evidence supporting the accuracy of the

    We're looking for a principle that instructs viewers on what they should / should not regard as an accurate portrayal. This principle tells us when a dramatic presentation would be better / worse suited for educational purposes. It doesn't have any language about viewers or about whether or not a portrayal should be regarded as accurate.

  4. Bad Conclusion Match4% picked this

    Dramatic presentations of historical events should never sacrifice accuracy in order to tell a

    We're looking for a principle that instructs viewers on what they should / should not regard as an accurate portrayal. This principle is about what dramatic presentations of historical events should / should not do.

  5. Correct78% picked this

    One should never regard a historical account to be accurate unless one has considered the evidence on

    Why this is right

    This is actually the only answer about viewers, and the only answer using conclusion language like whether or not someone "should regard X as accurate". So if we focused on the conclusion, as we should on Strengthen + Principle (and Sufficient Assumption), we have only one answer to consider. Unless = "if not" If you have not considered then you should the evidence on which a ? not regard it as historical account is based accurate We're trying to support a conclusion that we shouldn't regard historical films as accurate. When it comes to historical films, is the trigger applicable? When we watch a historical film, have we considered the evidence on which this historical account is based? No we haven't, since we were told that these presentations cannot present the evidence for the accuracy of what they portray. Since the film can't present the evidence, we viewers have not considered the evidence, and thus according to this rule we should not regard this historical film to be accurate.

    Skill tested: Principle-Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free