Reading Comprehension

PT150 · S1 · P3 · Q16 Genres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this special type of reader confronts literature with such incredulity and suspicions that he or she might read any narrative as a detective story.

Topic

The relationship between literary genres and the ways readers approach texts—how genres are less about textual features and more about the reader's mode of reading.

Framework

Old / New — Both passages reject the traditional, “Old” way of categorizing genres (by content or form) and advance a “New” approach: genres are characterized by how readers read (i.e., by reading protocols).

Main Point

Both Borges and the author of Passage B argue that literary genres are shaped primarily by the expectations, approaches, and participation of readers—what really unites a genre is how it is read, not just its formal content. - (End of Passage A, Paragraph 2) - (Passage B, Paragraph 1)

P1 (Passage A): The Detective Reader and Borges’s Interest

Borges claims that detective stories create a special kind of reader—one who is suspicious and always looking for clues—which inspired Borges’s own writing and supports a more general insight about literature and how we read it.

P2 (Passage A): Reader Participation Defines Genre

According to Borges, literature isn’t complete without the reader’s participation. What links works within a genre is not their contents, but how readers approach and interact with them.

P1 (Passage B): Critique of Content-Based Genre & New Proposal

Defining genre by content is messy—there are always texts that don’t fit. It’s more effective to see genres as sets of reading protocols: the patterns and expectations readers bring to and use with certain texts.

16.

Which one of the following is true about the argumentative structures of the two passages?

  1. Correct

    Passage A moves from the

    Why this is right

    This is actually referring to the Theme / Example stuff we talked about in the anticipation. Passage A starts with the specific example (how we read detective fiction) before moving to the general theme (genre is based on reading protocol). Passage B starts with the theme (genre is based on reading protocol) before moving to the specific example (how we read poetry).

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    78% picked this

  2. Passage A begins with a

    Trap

    Out of Scope Passage A: competing view There aren't any competing views in Passage A. It begins with Borges's view, which the author agrees with and makes the centerpiece of the passage.

    3% picked this

  3. Both passages respond to a

    Out of Scope: counterexamples

    We were looking for Theme + Example, but neither passage contained any counterexamples. The main thesis of each was, "Genre should be determined based on the reading protocol we use while reading works typical to the genre". There weren't any (let alone a series of) counterexamples in which genre shouldn't be based on reading protocol.

    1% picked this

  4. Both passages open with a

    Out of Scope: apparent contradiction

    There definitely isn't any apparent contradiction at the outset of A. It just begins by discussing Borges's thoughts on detective fiction and then segues into a broader discussion of how reading protocol determines genre.

    5% picked this

  5. Both passages explore the implications

    Out of Scope: explore the implications

    We might say that paragraph 1 of passage A contains the thought experiment of, "You could potentially read any narrative as a detective story", but paragraph 2 had nothing to do with exploring the implications of that. (for example, "What if we read Pride & Prejudice as a detective story?") We might say that paragraph 1 of passage B contains the thought experiment of, "we could define genre as sets of texts sharing certain thematic similarities", but the author doesn't spend the rest of the passage exploring the implications of that. Instead, she pivots to defining genre based on reading protocol and explores that idea.

    13% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free