Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT150 S1 P3 Q16 ExplanationGenres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMethodHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this “special type of reader” confronts literature with such his account also draws our attention to an insight into the general nature of literature.

Literature, according to Borges, is “an aesthetic event” that “requires the conjunction of reader and text,” and what the detective story highlights, he suggests, is the way in which the reader forms the conditions of possibility for this “aesthetic event.” Borges imagines that the participation of the reader is not extrinsic to read, rather than, say, a set of formal elements found within the works.

Passage B One can, if one wants, define genres of fiction as sets of texts sharing certain thematic similarities, but the taxonomic difficulties of such an approach are notorious. The problem of “borderline cases”—especially in science fiction—arises so often that the definition fails to demarcate genres entirely. A more fruitful way to that yield a particularly rich reading experience when read according to one protocol rather than another.

Our major critical effort must therefore be an exploration of the specific workings of many of the individual rhetorical configurations that contour, exploit, or even create a specific reading protocol. Here—to give an example outside of fiction—is a general description of one aspect of the reading protocols associated with poetry: with poetry, rhetorical figures by which differences between our world and the world of the story are suggested.

What this question is testing

Method

Your task

Describe how the argument proceeds — the technique it uses to reach its conclusion.

Common trap

Answers that describe a method the argument doesn't actually use.

Winning move

Track the role each statement plays, then match that to the choice describing the same moves.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

Which one of the following is true about the argumentative structures of

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct77% picked this

    Passage A moves from the specific to the general, whereas passage B moves from the

    Why this is right

    This is actually referring to the Theme / Example stuff we talked about in the anticipation. Passage A starts with the specific example (how we read detective fiction) before moving to the general theme (genre is based on reading protocol). Passage B starts with the theme (genre is based on reading protocol) before moving to the specific example (how we read poetry).

    Skill tested: Method · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap4% picked this

    Passage A begins with a discussion of a competing view, whereas passage B builds up

    Out of Scope Passage A: competing view There aren't any competing views in Passage A. It begins with Borges's view, which the author agrees with and makes the centerpiece of the passage.

  3. Out of Scope: counterexamples2% picked this

    Both passages respond to a series of counterexamples to their

    We were looking for Theme + Example, but neither passage contained any counterexamples. The main thesis of each was, "Genre should be determined based on the reading protocol we use while reading works typical to the genre". There weren't any (let alone a series of) counterexamples in which genre shouldn't be based on reading protocol.

  4. Out of Scope: apparent contradiction5% picked this

    Both passages open with a description of an apparent contradiction that they then

    There definitely isn't any apparent contradiction at the outset of A. It just begins by discussing Borges's thoughts on detective fiction and then segues into a broader discussion of how reading protocol determines genre.

  5. Out of Scope: explore the implications13% picked this

    Both passages explore the implications of a thought experiment described at

    We might say that paragraph 1 of passage A contains the thought experiment of, "You could potentially read any narrative as a detective story", but paragraph 2 had nothing to do with exploring the implications of that. (for example, "What if we read Pride & Prejudice as a detective story?") We might say that paragraph 1 of passage B contains the thought experiment of, "we could define genre as sets of texts sharing certain thematic similarities", but the author doesn't spend the rest of the passage exploring the implications of that. Instead, she pivots to defining genre based on reading protocol and explores that idea.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free