Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT150 S1 P3 Q15 Explanation

Genres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this “special type of reader” confronts literature with such his account also draws our attention to an insight into the general nature of literature.

Literature, according to Borges, is “an aesthetic event” that “requires the conjunction of reader and text,” and what the detective story highlights, he suggests, is the way in which the reader forms the conditions of possibility for this “aesthetic event.” Borges imagines that the participation of the reader is not extrinsic to read, rather than, say, a set of formal elements found within the works.

Passage B One can, if one wants, define genres of fiction as sets of texts sharing certain thematic similarities, but the taxonomic difficulties of such an approach are notorious. The problem of “borderline cases”—especially in science fiction—arises so often that the definition fails to demarcate genres entirely. A more fruitful way to that yield a particularly rich reading experience when read according to one protocol rather than another.

Our major critical effort must therefore be an exploration of the specific workings of many of the individual rhetorical configurations that contour, exploit, or even create a specific reading protocol. Here—to give an example outside of fiction—is a general description of one aspect of the reading protocols associated with poetry: with poetry, rhetorical figures by which differences between our world and the world of the story are suggested.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the stance expressed by the author of passage A

Answer choices

  1. Correct69% picked this

    complete

    Why this is right

    This seems unnervingly strong at first, but it's the best available answer. We can tell our author agrees with Borges because he says at the end of the 1st paragraph that Borges's account draws our attention to a general insight about literature. The 2nd paragraph then spells out this insight. So then the final sentence, the "Thus", is essentially the simultaneous takeaway of Borges and the author.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Unsupported: reluctance6% picked this

    reluctant

    We barely have any author tone to draw on at all, other than the last claim in the 1st paragraph. Nowhere in here can we point to "reluctance", to the author expressing a qualm like, "Grrrr, I don't want to agree with Borges here, but I suppose I do."

  3. Unsupported: cautious21% picked this

    cautious

    We barely have any author tone to draw on at all, other than the last claim in the 1st paragraph, so an answer about "neutrality" would have seemed pretty tempting. But cautious neutrality is not the same as just a detached, invisible author. To justify cautious neutrality, you have to be able to point to moments where the author is being careful not to take a side. There's nothing like that here. Nothing like, "While it's impossible to say which side is right", or, "Although I can't speak to which option is preferable, one thing I can say is ..." We should ultimately be rejecting this based on "neutrality" as well, because if the author thinks that Borges's account draws our attention to an insight about literature, then she is not neutral. She agrees with his thinking.

  4. Opposite: skepticism2% picked this

    strong

    Not only is there no negative attitude anywhere from the author, there is actually positive attitude ("his account draws our attention to an insight into literature").

  5. Opposite: rejection1% picked this

    outright

    Not only is there no negative attitude anywhere from the author, there is actually positive attitude ("his account draws our attention to an insight into literature").

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free