Reading Comprehension

PT150 · S1 · P3 · Q15 Genres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this special type of reader confronts literature with such incredulity and suspicions that he or she might read any narrative as a detective story.

Topic

The relationship between literary genres and the ways readers approach texts—how genres are less about textual features and more about the reader's mode of reading.

Framework

Old / New — Both passages reject the traditional, “Old” way of categorizing genres (by content or form) and advance a “New” approach: genres are characterized by how readers read (i.e., by reading protocols).

Main Point

Both Borges and the author of Passage B argue that literary genres are shaped primarily by the expectations, approaches, and participation of readers—what really unites a genre is how it is read, not just its formal content. - (End of Passage A, Paragraph 2) - (Passage B, Paragraph 1)

P1 (Passage A): The Detective Reader and Borges’s Interest

Borges claims that detective stories create a special kind of reader—one who is suspicious and always looking for clues—which inspired Borges’s own writing and supports a more general insight about literature and how we read it.

P2 (Passage A): Reader Participation Defines Genre

According to Borges, literature isn’t complete without the reader’s participation. What links works within a genre is not their contents, but how readers approach and interact with them.

P1 (Passage B): Critique of Content-Based Genre & New Proposal

Defining genre by content is messy—there are always texts that don’t fit. It’s more effective to see genres as sets of reading protocols: the patterns and expectations readers bring to and use with certain texts.

15.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the stance expressed by the author of passage A toward Borges's view?

  1. Correct

    complete agreement

    Why this is right

    This seems unnervingly strong at first, but it's the best available answer. We can tell our author agrees with Borges because he says at the end of the 1st paragraph that Borges's account draws our attention to a general insight about literature. The 2nd paragraph then spells out this insight. So then the final sentence, the "Thus", is essentially the simultaneous takeaway of Borges and the author.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    70% picked this

  2. reluctant acceptance

    Unsupported: reluctance

    We barely have any author tone to draw on at all, other than the last claim in the 1st paragraph. Nowhere in here can we point to "reluctance", to the author expressing a qualm like, "Grrrr, I don't want to agree with Borges here, but I suppose I do."

    6% picked this

  3. cautious neutrality

    Unsupported: cautious

    We barely have any author tone to draw on at all, other than the last claim in the 1st paragraph, so an answer about "neutrality" would have seemed pretty tempting. But cautious neutrality is not the same as just a detached, invisible author. To justify cautious neutrality, you have to be able to point to moments where the author is being careful not to take a side. There's nothing like that here. Nothing like, "While it's impossible to say which side is right", or, "Although I can't speak to which option is preferable, one thing I can say is ..." We should ultimately be rejecting this based on "neutrality" as well, because if the author thinks that Borges's account draws our attention to an insight about literature, then she is not neutral. She agrees with his thinking.

    21% picked this

  4. strong skepticism

    Opposite: skepticism

    Not only is there no negative attitude anywhere from the author, there is actually positive attitude ("his account draws our attention to an insight into literature").

    2% picked this

  5. outright rejection

    Opposite: rejection

    Not only is there no negative attitude anywhere from the author, there is actually positive attitude ("his account draws our attention to an insight into literature").

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free