Reading Comprehension

PT150 · S1 · P3 · Q14 Genres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this special type of reader confronts literature with such incredulity and suspicions that he or she might read any narrative as a detective story.

Topic

The relationship between literary genres and the ways readers approach texts—how genres are less about textual features and more about the reader's mode of reading.

Framework

Old / New — Both passages reject the traditional, “Old” way of categorizing genres (by content or form) and advance a “New” approach: genres are characterized by how readers read (i.e., by reading protocols).

Main Point

Both Borges and the author of Passage B argue that literary genres are shaped primarily by the expectations, approaches, and participation of readers—what really unites a genre is how it is read, not just its formal content. - (End of Passage A, Paragraph 2) - (Passage B, Paragraph 1)

P1 (Passage A): The Detective Reader and Borges’s Interest

Borges claims that detective stories create a special kind of reader—one who is suspicious and always looking for clues—which inspired Borges’s own writing and supports a more general insight about literature and how we read it.

P2 (Passage A): Reader Participation Defines Genre

According to Borges, literature isn’t complete without the reader’s participation. What links works within a genre is not their contents, but how readers approach and interact with them.

P1 (Passage B): Critique of Content-Based Genre & New Proposal

Defining genre by content is messy—there are always texts that don’t fit. It’s more effective to see genres as sets of reading protocols: the patterns and expectations readers bring to and use with certain texts.

14.

The authors of the passages would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. Short works of fiction are

    Unsupported Comparison: easier

    There’s nothing in either passage that connects the length of the work to how easy it is to categorize. Both authors could agree that works of fiction that involve a distinct reading protocol are easier to categorize by genre than ones whose style of writing does not provoke readers to read in distinct ways.

    0% picked this

  2. The first works of detective

    Too Strong: first

    Neither passage talks about the very first attempts at detective or science fiction.

    1% picked this

  3. There is no scholarly value

    Too Strong: no value

    This is just way too harsh. These authors aren’t totally anti-genre. They just think of genre more interns of how a reader in that genre reads, rather than what content is typically in a book from that genre. But we can’t support this total condemnation of people who try to decide on the boundaries of a genre.

    5% picked this

  4. Genre stories are typically of

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: typically / in proportion Out of Scope: literary value The authors didn’t really get into how much literary value a work does or doesn’t have. And it’s an extremely strong formulation to say that value is proportional to the degree to which you rebel against genre conventions. If your book rebelled against genre conventions 30% more than Dave’s book, then your book has 30% more value?

    7% picked this

  5. Correct

    Two works of fiction could

    Why this is right

    This is the only answer with weak language, so that makes it most attractive on a first pass. We anticipated that the correct answer would have something to do with the fact that both authors agree that reading protocols is a thing. This answer is making use of that concept. These authors don’t define genre based on the plot, or the characters, or the setting. They base genre on reading protocol. There could be two books that are both about a father in his 50s searching for and finding his 20 year old son, taking place in Boston. But if one of them is detective fiction, the reader will grasp suspiciously to every new clue about where the son is. If the other is a coming of age novel, the reader will pay attention to the ways in which the character of the son changes from the start to the finish. Since there are different reading protocols, they are different genres. This answer is so weakly worded that it would be crazy to disagree with it. You’d be saying every single time two works have similar plots, characters, and settings, they books automatically belong to the same genre.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    86% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free