Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT150 S1 P3 Q17 Explanation

Genres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this “special type of reader” confronts literature with such his account also draws our attention to an insight into the general nature of literature.

Literature, according to Borges, is “an aesthetic event” that “requires the conjunction of reader and text,” and what the detective story highlights, he suggests, is the way in which the reader forms the conditions of possibility for this “aesthetic event.” Borges imagines that the participation of the reader is not extrinsic to read, rather than, say, a set of formal elements found within the works.

Passage B One can, if one wants, define genres of fiction as sets of texts sharing certain thematic similarities, but the taxonomic difficulties of such an approach are notorious. The problem of “borderline cases”—especially in science fiction—arises so often that the definition fails to demarcate genres entirely. A more fruitful way to that yield a particularly rich reading experience when read according to one protocol rather than another.

Our major critical effort must therefore be an exploration of the specific workings of many of the individual rhetorical configurations that contour, exploit, or even create a specific reading protocol. Here—to give an example outside of fiction—is a general description of one aspect of the reading protocols associated with poetry: with poetry, rhetorical figures by which differences between our world and the world of the story are suggested.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
17.

The author of passage B would be most likely to agree with which one

Answer choices

  1. Correct56% picked this

    Fictional works that were not written to exploit the reading protocol of a particular genre are sometimes borderline

    Why this is right

    We can support this with the last sentence of the first paragraph: the texts most central (least borderline) to a genre are those texts that were clearly written to exploit a particular protocol. Thus, the texts least central / most on the periphery / most on the borderline would be those texts that were not clearly written to exploit a particular protocol. Making this answer all the more delicious is its extremely supportable, soft language: sometimes.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Out of Scope15% picked this

    Readers' expectations regarding a particular fictional work are not essential to

    Out of Scope: readers' expectations Opposite, if Anything Passage B doesn't ever talk about readers' expectations regarding a particular work. However, the author thinks that what is essential to a genre classification of the book is the intended reading protocol of a book. There might be a book about a deep ocean family of sharks, but it could be considered a murder mystery if readers were meant to take in the story as though the author would be discreetly depositing enough clues throughout the story that a clever reader could solve the central question of the plot before the narrative itself reveals it. But how would a reader know to read this shark novel as though it's a murder mystery if they didn't already have an expectation that this shark novel was a murder mystery? So if anything, (even though the author never talked about readers' expectations), we'd expect our author to think that a readers' expectations are essential, because a readers' expectations are pretty closely aligned with what reading protocol they think they should be using.

  3. Too Strong: most useful Opposite5% picked this

    Thematic similarities constitute the most useful basis for demarcating genres

    The author is saying let's stop trying to define genre based on thematic similarities -- the taxonomic difficulties of such an approach are notorious. The author thinks that "reading protocol" constitutes the most useful basis for demarcating genres of fiction.

  4. Contradicted19% picked this

    The interpretation of a sentence that appears in a fictional work does not depend on the genre to

    The author says that, "a more fruitful way to distinguish genres is by distinguishing reading protocols: between ways of reading, responding to sentences, and making various sentences and various texts make sense". In other words, genres are determined by what reading protocol is best used to read something from that genre, and using a given reading protocol determines how we interpret a given sentence within a text. So it seems like the genre determines the reading protocol which determines the interpretation of a given sentence.

  5. Too Strong5% picked this

    Every work of fiction of a given genre must include the themes and other content elements that are shared by the

    Too Strong: every / must Opposite, if anything This is not only overly loaded language, but it doesn't sound like our author, because it's making it seem like themes are important to the genre a book belongs to. The author is explicitly rejecting that idea in the first two sentences and then pivoting into her preferred alternative, basing genre on reading protocol. This answer would be more supportable if it said, "every work of fiction of a given genre should yield a particularly rich reading experience when read according to the reading protocol that is central to works of that genre".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free