Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT150 S1 P3 Q18 ExplanationGenres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this “special type of reader” confronts literature with such his account also draws our attention to an insight into the general nature of literature.

Literature, according to Borges, is “an aesthetic event” that “requires the conjunction of reader and text,” and what the detective story highlights, he suggests, is the way in which the reader forms the conditions of possibility for this “aesthetic event.” Borges imagines that the participation of the reader is not extrinsic to read, rather than, say, a set of formal elements found within the works.

Passage B One can, if one wants, define genres of fiction as sets of texts sharing certain thematic similarities, but the taxonomic difficulties of such an approach are notorious. The problem of “borderline cases”—especially in science fiction—arises so often that the definition fails to demarcate genres entirely. A more fruitful way to that yield a particularly rich reading experience when read according to one protocol rather than another.

Our major critical effort must therefore be an exploration of the specific workings of many of the individual rhetorical configurations that contour, exploit, or even create a specific reading protocol. Here—to give an example outside of fiction—is a general description of one aspect of the reading protocols associated with poetry: with poetry, rhetorical figures by which differences between our world and the world of the story are suggested.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Borges and the author of passage B would be most likely to agree with which one of

Answer choices, explained

  1. Opposite Too Strong: fully determined10% picked this

    The genre of fiction to which a story belongs is fully determined by

    Both of them would vehemently disagree, saying that the reader's reading protocol might actually be the most salient way to categorize what genre a given work belongs to.

  2. Correct49% picked this

    Any science fiction story could be read as if it were

    Why this is right

    This sounds strong because of "any", but it's still a soft claim because of "could". It is possible to read a sci-fi story as though it were a detective story? What does it mean to read something as though it were a detective story? It means to use the sort of reading protocol that is most useful / most rewarded when reading stuff from that genre. In the first paragraph of A, we get Borges literally saying "he or she might read any narrative as a detective story", so we're really just figuring out whether we have decent support from B. Yes, towards the end of B's first paragraph, it says "we are free to read any text by any reading protocol we wish".

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong18% picked this

    Every work of fiction unambiguously belongs to some particular genre

    Too Strong: every / unambiguously No Support from A Borges definitely never gets specific on this topic. Only B really talks about how plausible it is to make a taxonomy of genres such that you don't have any tricky "edge cases". And B essentially contradicts this answer by saying it's notoriously hard to do it; borderline cases arise often; and towards the end of the first paragraph the author of B is acknowledging that some texts will be "more central to a genre" than others, indicating that there could be a more ambiguous periphery to a genre where works could go, but don't necessarily need to go.

  4. Too Strong: never Unsupported from A12% picked this

    Some rhetorical figures appear in poetry that never appear in

    Borges never discusses any rhetorical figures in poetry, so we don't really need to consider this one too hard. The stuff in B about this would not justify that "some things in poetry never appear in prose".

  5. Too Strong: can't unless11% picked this

    A story cannot be truly enjoyed unless the reader knows to which genre it is

    Neither author delved into what "true enjoyment" of a text requires, so we can't support this very harshly worded maxim.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free