Reading Comprehension

PT150 · S1 · P3 · Q18 Genres of Fiction

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A In a 1978 lecture titled “The Detective Story,” Jorge Luis Borges observes that, “The detective novel has created a special type of reader,” and adds, “If Poe created the detective story, he subsequently created the reader of detective fiction.” For Borges, this special type of reader confronts literature with such incredulity and suspicions that he or she might read any narrative as a detective story.

Topic

The relationship between literary genres and the ways readers approach texts—how genres are less about textual features and more about the reader's mode of reading.

Framework

Old / New — Both passages reject the traditional, “Old” way of categorizing genres (by content or form) and advance a “New” approach: genres are characterized by how readers read (i.e., by reading protocols).

Main Point

Both Borges and the author of Passage B argue that literary genres are shaped primarily by the expectations, approaches, and participation of readers—what really unites a genre is how it is read, not just its formal content. - (End of Passage A, Paragraph 2) - (Passage B, Paragraph 1)

P1 (Passage A): The Detective Reader and Borges’s Interest

Borges claims that detective stories create a special kind of reader—one who is suspicious and always looking for clues—which inspired Borges’s own writing and supports a more general insight about literature and how we read it.

P2 (Passage A): Reader Participation Defines Genre

According to Borges, literature isn’t complete without the reader’s participation. What links works within a genre is not their contents, but how readers approach and interact with them.

P1 (Passage B): Critique of Content-Based Genre & New Proposal

Defining genre by content is messy—there are always texts that don’t fit. It’s more effective to see genres as sets of reading protocols: the patterns and expectations readers bring to and use with certain texts.

18.

Borges and the author of passage B would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. The genre of fiction to

    Opposite Too Strong: fully determined

    Both of them would vehemently disagree, saying that the reader's reading protocol might actually be the most salient way to categorize what genre a given work belongs to.

    10% picked this

  2. Correct

    Any science fiction story could

    Why this is right

    This sounds strong because of "any", but it's still a soft claim because of "could". It is possible to read a sci-fi story as though it were a detective story? What does it mean to read something as though it were a detective story? It means to use the sort of reading protocol that is most useful / most rewarded when reading stuff from that genre. In the first paragraph of A, we get Borges literally saying "he or she might read any narrative as a detective story", so we're really just figuring out whether we have decent support from B. Yes, towards the end of B's first paragraph, it says "we are free to read any text by any reading protocol we wish".

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    50% picked this

  3. Every work of fiction unambiguously

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: every / unambiguously No Support from A Borges definitely never gets specific on this topic. Only B really talks about how plausible it is to make a taxonomy of genres such that you don't have any tricky "edge cases". And B essentially contradicts this answer by saying it's notoriously hard to do it; borderline cases arise often; and towards the end of the first paragraph the author of B is acknowledging that some texts will be "more central to a genre" than others, indicating that there could be a more ambiguous periphery to a genre where works could go, but don't necessarily need to go.

    18% picked this

  4. Some rhetorical figures appear in

    Too Strong: never Unsupported from A

    Borges never discusses any rhetorical figures in poetry, so we don't really need to consider this one too hard. The stuff in B about this would not justify that "some things in poetry never appear in prose".

    11% picked this

  5. A story cannot be truly

    Too Strong: can't unless

    Neither author delved into what "true enjoyment" of a text requires, so we can't support this very harshly worded maxim.

    11% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free