Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT150 S2 Q15 ExplanationChildren clearly have a reasonably

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMain Conclusion

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Children clearly have a reasonably sophisticated understanding of what is real and what is pretend. Once they have acquired a command of language, we can ask them which is which, and they generally get it right. Even a much younger child who runs away when she sees her father roaring and prowling would be impossible to explain if they could not distinguish the real from the pretend.

What this question is testing

Main Conclusion

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
15.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn

Answer choices, explained

  1. Correct88% picked this

    Children apparently have a reasonably sophisticated understanding of what is real and

    Why this is right

    This looks like a pretty tight rephrasing of the first sentence, which is what we identified as our Main Conclusion.

    Skill tested: Main Conclusion · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Bad Match for 1st Sentence2% picked this

    Children who have acquired a command of language generally answer correctly when asked about whether a thing

    This answer matches more closely to the 2nd sentence, but the 1st sentence was the main conclusion, and it doesn't mention anything about "acquiring command of a language". The author wasn't saying that "only kids with command of language can differentiate real and pretend". In fact, she explains that "even a much younger child [who doesn't yet have command of language] can tell the difference between real and pretend, as evidenced by the fact that they run away from their father, the 'lion', squealing with glee not fear."

  3. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    Even a very young child can tell the difference between a lion and someone pretending

    This looks nothing like the 1st sentence, which definitely doesn't talk about lions.

  4. Unrelated to Goal0% picked this

    Children would be terrified if they believed they were in the presence of

    This looks nothing like the 1st sentence, which definitely doesn't talk about lions.

  5. Bad Match for 1st Sentence9% picked this

    The pleasure children get from make-believe would be impossible to explain if they could not distinguish between what is

    Parts of this resemble the first sentence, but other parts "the pleasure children get from make-believe" are clearly not a match for the first sentence.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free