Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT150 S3 Q7 ExplanationPollster: When opinion researchers

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsNecessary Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Pollster: When opinion researchers need a population sample that reflects the demographic characteristics of the national population, they choose their sample on the basis of national census data. Not everyone participates in the national census, despite its being mandatory. If, however, census participation became voluntary, as some have proposed, the participation rate discover the opinions of the national population would have less accurate results.

What this question is testing

Necessary Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the pollster's

Answer choices, explained

  1. Weakens, if anything1% picked this

    Using data from the national census is not the only way for opinion researchers to get a population sample that reflects the

    This makes it sound like pollsters have other ways to cross-reference the data they get from the census, which means a change to census participation might not really mess up the pollsters' samples. If we negate this and say, "using census data is the only way for pollsters to get a population sample", that would help the author argue that if we tinker with census data we might make population samples less accurate.

  2. Irrelevant Distinction17% picked this

    Among people who do not currently participate in the national census, few, if any, would agree to participate

    Would it hurt the argument if we negated this and said that there are tons of people currently abstaining from the mandatory census who would actually start doing the census if it were voluntary? No, that's weird but fine. The premise doesn't change — in the end the participation rate would be much lower. If that comes about because 1 million people who did the mandatory census won't do the voluntary whereas 500,000 people who didn't do the mandatory will do the voluntary, that doesn't change anything about the author's argument. In fact that weird flux where cooperators now abstain and abstainers now cooperate makes it more likely that the sample of people participating has meaningfully changed.

  3. Correct73% picked this

    The group of people who would participate in a voluntary national census would differ in its demographic characteristics from the group of people who

    Why this is right

    If we negate this, we get the objection we were predicting: the group of people who would participate in a voluntary census would not differ (would be identical, demographically, to the people who were participating in the mandatory one). If the mandatory census was 52% women, 48% men and the people who respond to the voluntary census are also 52% women, 48% men, then you're getting the same demographic profile of the country for that demographic characteristic. If this were the same for all demographic characteristics, then the census data between the mandatory and voluntary would be identical in terms of percent's, and that's all that matters when you're a pollster trying to construct a representative sample.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Irrelevant Comparison5% picked this

    The people who refuse to participate in opinion polls comprise a group with approximately the same demographic characteristics as the group of people who

    The author hasn't said or implied anything about the group of people who refuse to participate in opinion polls. He doesn't care whether their demographic characteristics are similar or different compared to any other group.

  5. Irrelevant Distinction3% picked this

    The percentage of the nation’s population that does not participate in the mandatory national census does not change significantly

    This has the tempting ruling out "not / no" form. When we negate this answer we get that "the percent of people participating in the mandatory national census does vary a lot from census to census", does that hurt the argument? Not really. The author is just saying that a voluntary census would have a much lower participation rate, which is compatible with ups and downs. If we saw the up and down of the participation rate of mandatory census on a line graph, the author is just saying that the participation rate of the voluntary census would be a line whose data points are lower than they would be if the census were mandatory. Perhaps an easier way to assess this is to ask yourself, "was the author assuming that participation in the mandatory census very, very consistent?" Nothing in the argument suggests that.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free