Reading Comprehension

PT150 · S1 · P1 · Q2 The Greenhouse Effect

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The following passage was written in the mid-1990s.

Topic

The evidence for global warming, the role of greenhouse gases, and evaluating alternative explanations for the recent unprecedented rise in Earth's atmospheric temperature.

Framework

Answer / Explain (with a touch of Present Debate: alternative explanations vs. greenhouse effect)

Main Point

Recent scientific evidence shows that the Earth’s average temperature has risen to levels not seen in the past 1,000 years, and while some alternative explanations exist, the best explanation for this unprecedented warming is the effect of greenhouse gases. The Most Valuable Sentence: Appears at the end of the last paragraph —

P1: Evidence for Unprecedented Warming and the Greenhouse Effect

The passage opens by telling us that compelling new evidence shows Earth’s atmosphere has recently warmed in a way that hasn’t happened in the last 1,000 years. This is based on analyzing things like ice samples, tree rings, and coral. The idea that greenhouse gases are causing this rise is getting stronger, even though it’s still debated.

P2: Addressing Problems with Early Models & the Role of Sulfates

Early computer models predicted even more warming than we’re seeing, which critics used to question the greenhouse theory. But new research shows that airborne sulfates (from volcanoes and pollution) actually reflect sunlight and offset some of the warming, explaining the mismatch and closing the gap between past predictions and what has actually happened.

P3: Considering Solar Variations as an Alternative Explanation

Another possible reason for the warming is changes in solar energy, but even though these solar cycles seem to track with temperature ups and downs over the decades, solar models can’t account for the full extent of the recent warming. The current rise exceeds what solar variation alone could produce, leading the author to conclude that greenhouse gases are still the main culprit.

2.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the relation between the argumentation in the second paragraph and that in the third paragraph?

  1. Two complementary theories that the

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: two theories in 2nd There's only one theory mentioned in the 2nd paragraph, and that's the greenhouse theory. That paragraph discusses early greenhouse theory (which didn't realize it should be factoring in sulfates) and current greenhouse theory (which does not factor in sulfates), but those are the same theory.

    2% picked this

  2. A theory that the author

    Opposite: shows to be problematic

    In the 2nd paragraph the author is showing that the greenhouse theory is stronger than ever, now that it's realized how to adjust its predictions to account for the cooling effect of sulfates.

    4% picked this

  3. Correct

    A theory that the author

    Why this is right

    The author discusses the greenhouse theory in the second paragraph. Does she tentatively accept this theory after weighing additional considerations in the third? Sure. The additional considerations in the third are, "we wouldn't be able to explain the magnitude of this warming by pointing just at variations in solar radiation". The tentative acceptance happens in the last sentence: It seems reasonable to conclude that ... greenhouse gases represent the best explanation of [the upward shift in earth's atmospheric equilibrium temperature]. We might have wished for a stronger endorsement than "tentatively accepted", but the author is not definitively saying greenhouse theory is correct. She's saying "it seems reasonable to conclude that it's the best explanation (we know of presently)".

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    70% picked this

  4. A theory that the author

    Out of Scope: revised

    The greenhouse theory is not proposed in the 2nd paragraph, but in the end of the 1st. The greenhouse theory is defended by the author in the 2nd. The greenhouse theory is not revised at all, let alone substantially revised, in the 3rd paragraph.

    6% picked this

  5. A theory whose validity is

    Opposite: author questions validity

    In the 2nd paragraph the author is showing that the greenhouse theory is stronger than ever, now that it's realized how to adjust its predictions to account for the cooling effect of sulfates. This answer says that the greenhouse theory is shown to be consistent with observed data in the 3rd paragraph, but that actually happens in the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph.

    18% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free