Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT150 S1 P1 Q2 ExplanationThe Greenhouse Effect

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsOrganizationScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The following passage was written in

Evidence that the earth’s atmosphere has warmed has become quite compelling, in part because it has been reinforced recently by the development of accurate profiles of average annual temperatures throughout the last 1,000 years. These data, inferred from studies of geological patterns and samples of ice deposits, tree rings, and coral growth elevated levels in the atmosphere of certain gases that prevent heat from radiating back into space.

Early models charting the greenhouse effect were somewhat inconsistent with observed data; they estimated that the increase in the earth’s atmospheric temperature over recent decades should have been higher than the increase observed in actuality, which led opponents to question the validity of the greenhouse theory. But new methods have enabled scientists ice, these scientists have calculated theoretical temperatures for recent decades that are consistent with observed temperatures.

Another question for proponents of the greenhouse theory comes from scientists who have attempted to tie changes in the earth’s atmospheric temperature to variations in solar energy. From observations of cycles in several types of solar phenomena, these scientists have developed models that chart variations in the sun’s heating effects, and the have raised its equilibrium temperature, and that greenhouse gases represent the best explanation of that shift.

What this question is testing

Organization

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
2.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the relation between the argumentation in the second paragraph and that

Answer choices, explained

  1. Out of Scope2% picked this

    Two complementary theories that the author compares in the second paragraph are then contrasted in the third paragraph, where the first theory is ultimately

    Out of Scope: two theories in 2nd There's only one theory mentioned in the 2nd paragraph, and that's the greenhouse theory. That paragraph discusses early greenhouse theory (which didn't realize it should be factoring in sulfates) and current greenhouse theory (which does not factor in sulfates), but those are the same theory.

  2. Opposite: shows to be problematic4% picked this

    A theory that the author shows to be problematic in the second paragraph is tentatively rejected in the third paragraph in light of compelling

    In the 2nd paragraph the author is showing that the greenhouse theory is stronger than ever, now that it's realized how to adjust its predictions to account for the cooling effect of sulfates.

  3. Correct70% picked this

    A theory that the author discusses in the second paragraph is tentatively accepted after weighing additional considerations

    Why this is right

    The author discusses the greenhouse theory in the second paragraph. Does she tentatively accept this theory after weighing additional considerations in the third? Sure. The additional considerations in the third are, "we wouldn't be able to explain the magnitude of this warming by pointing just at variations in solar radiation". The tentative acceptance happens in the last sentence: It seems reasonable to conclude that ... greenhouse gases represent the best explanation of [the upward shift in earth's atmospheric equilibrium temperature]. We might have wished for a stronger endorsement than "tentatively accepted", but the author is not definitively saying greenhouse theory is correct. She's saying "it seems reasonable to conclude that it's the best explanation (we know of presently)".

    Skill tested: Organization · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope: revised6% picked this

    A theory that the author proposes and defends in the second paragraph is substantially revised in the third paragraph

    The greenhouse theory is not proposed in the 2nd paragraph, but in the end of the 1st. The greenhouse theory is defended by the author in the 2nd. The greenhouse theory is not revised at all, let alone substantially revised, in the 3rd paragraph.

  5. Opposite: author questions validity17% picked this

    A theory whose validity is questioned by the author in the second paragraph is shown in the third paragraph to

    In the 2nd paragraph the author is showing that the greenhouse theory is stronger than ever, now that it's realized how to adjust its predictions to account for the cooling effect of sulfates. This answer says that the greenhouse theory is shown to be consistent with observed data in the 3rd paragraph, but that actually happens in the final sentence of the 2nd paragraph.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free