Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT150 S2 Q18 Explanation

Some people prefer to avoid facing

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Some people prefer to avoid facing unpleasant truths and resent those whose unwanted honesty forces them into such a confrontation. Others dislike having any information, however painful, knowingly withheld from them. It is obvious then that if those in the former group others as they themselves want to be treated, _______.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following most reasonably completes the

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: otherwise willing7% picked this

    they will sometimes withhold comment in situations in which they would otherwise be

    The G1 person following this Golden Rule "treat others as you want to be treated" will always be withholding comment in situations involving unpleasant truths. We can't match up anything with the idea that "these G1 people would otherwise be willing to speak about these unpleasant truths". To put it another way, if the situation involves unpleasant truth, then G1 people will be "not willing to speak + withholding comment". If the situation involves pleasant truths, we don't actually know how G1 people will behave, but we might presume they would be "willing to speak + not withholding comment". We don't know of a scenario for them that combines "willing to speak + withholding comment".

  2. Correct84% picked this

    they will sometimes treat those in the latter group in a manner the members of this latter

    Why this is right

    This is addressing the tension that happens when a G1 talks to a G2 in a situation involving unpleasant truths. Since the G1 is following the rule to "treat others as you yourself would like to be treated", the G1 is going to avoid confronting an unpleasant truth. But that is not the manner that G2 people like. They want to hear and confront every truth, no matter how unpleasant. Say you're one of those people who likes mayonnaise on their french fries (you're gross, Europe). But you're dating someone who hates mayo on their fries. If you're ordering french fries for your date and you follow the rule to "treat others as you like to be treated", you'll be thinking, "Well if someone were buying fries for me, I would want them to slather mayo on the fries, so according to my moral rule, I should get mayo on the fries."

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope3% picked this

    those in the latter group must be guided by an entirely different

    Out of Scope: guided by diff principle We don't have any reason to think that G2 people are guided by a different moral rule. It's entirely possible that G1 and G2 all subscribe to the moral rule of "treat others as you want to be treated", and that just means that sometimes G1 people behave in G1 ways around a G2 person (who doesn't like that). And sometimes G2 people behave in G2 ways around a G1 person (who doesn't like that).

  4. Out of Scope: latter group's response4% picked this

    those in the latter group will respond by concealing

    We have no way to derive how someone in G2 will respond to someone in G1. This answer is saying that G2 will respect G1's preferred style and conceal the ugly truths. But we don't know that. Maybe G2 follows this same rule of "treat others as you want to be treated", in which case the G2 people will respond by confronting the unpleasant truths.

  5. Contradicted1% picked this

    the result will meet with the approval of

    There's no way for both groups to be happy when unpleasant truths are lurking nearby, because the two groups want opposite reactions: one group wants to conceal ugly truths, and the other group wants to address those truths.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free