Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT150 S3 Q10 ExplanationChanges in Britain’s National Health Service

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Changes in Britain’s National Health Service have led many British hospitals to end on-site laundry services for their staff. Although the water in a typical residential washing machine, unlike that in the industrial washing machines used by hospitals, does not reach temperatures high enough to kill the discontinuation of these services will not put patients at risk.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to justify the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Cheats Paradox6% picked this

    Hospital staff typically develop an immunity

    This suggests that hospital staff aren't likely to be at risk from Acinetobacter on their clothes, but that's not what we're concerned about. The hospital officials are talking about risk to patients.

  2. Unclear Impact3% picked this

    Hospital patients infected with Acinetobacter can be isolated from

    This might mean that hospital patients won't spread Acinetobacter directly to other patients, but it might still be possible for hospital staff to spread Acinetobacter to other patients if the bacterium gets on their clothes. We need a lot more information to see if this would actually justify the hospital officials' belief.

  3. Opposite2% picked this

    Most hospital staff made use of the on-site laundry services before

    This actually makes the hospital officials' belief less convincing. If the opposite were true—if few or no hospital staff used the on-site laundry services—that would help justify the officials' belief. We don't want an answer that states the opposite.

  4. Correct85% picked this

    Hospital staff are instructed to use clothes dryers at temperatures high enough

    Why this is right

    This suggests a reasonable, alternative way for hospital staff to kill Acinetobacter on their clothes.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Irrelevant Comparison4% picked this

    Water in residential washing machines reaches temperatures high enough to kill all dangerous bacteria

    It's still possible that Acinetobacter could pose a danger to patients even if this answer choice is true. The way that residential washing machines affect other bacteria is irrelevant.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free