Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT158 S3 Q16 ExplanationIf a belief is based on information

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

If a belief is based on information from a reliable source, then it is reasonable to maintain that belief. Furthermore, some beliefs are based on information from a reliable self-evident nor grounded in observable evidence.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Statements

Two rules of the belief game. Rule one: if your belief comes from a reliable source, it counts as reasonable. Rule two: some beliefs DO come from reliable sources but are neither self-evident nor backed by observable evidence. Basically, there are beliefs out there that check the "reliable source" box but fail the "obvious" and "you can see it" tests.

Evaluate

Combine the rules: those beliefs from rule two — reliable source, not self-evident, not observable — automatically qualify as reasonable under rule one. So now we know there are reasonable beliefs floating around that are neither self-evident nor grounded in anything you can observe. They get their "reasonable" badge from the reliable source alone, without needing to be obvious or visible.

Goal

Find the answer that captures this combined result — reasonable beliefs exist that are not self-evident and not grounded in observable evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

If all the statements above are true, which one of the following statements

Answer choices, explained

  1. Unprovable4% picked this

    Beliefs for which a person does not have observable evidence

    The passage says nothing about beliefs without observable evidence being unreasonable. The first statement tells us beliefs from reliable sources ARE reasonable — but it does not tell us that beliefs WITHOUT observable evidence are unreasonable. A belief could lack observable evidence, lack a reliable source, and still be reasonable for some other reason not discussed in the passage. This answer makes a sweeping claim about all beliefs without observable evidence that the passage provides no basis for. The passage identifies one sufficient condition for reasonableness (reliable source) but never identifies any condition for unreasonableness.

  2. Unprovable3% picked this

    Beliefs based on information from a reliable source

    The passage explicitly states the opposite for at least some beliefs: the second statement says some beliefs are based on reliable sources and are NOT self-evident. If those beliefs were self-evident, the second statement would be contradicted. Nothing in the passage supports the claim that reliable-source beliefs are self-evident. The passage treats "reliable source" and "self-evident" as independent properties — a belief can have one without the other. This answer incorrectly conflates two properties the passage carefully keeps separate.

  3. Unprovable15% picked this

    All reasonable beliefs for which a person has no observable evidence are based on information

    This answer claims that ALL reasonable beliefs without observable evidence are based on information from a reliable source. The passage only establishes that being based on a reliable source is one sufficient condition for reasonableness. There could be other paths to reasonableness that the passage does not mention — perhaps logical coherence, widespread agreement, or some other factor. The passage tells us reliable-source beliefs are reasonable, but it never says reliable sources are the ONLY way to be reasonable without observable evidence. This answer converts a one-way sufficient condition into an exhaustive claim about all reasonable beliefs lacking observable evidence.

  4. Unprovable9% picked this

    If a belief is not grounded in observable evidence, then it is

    This answer claims: if a belief is not grounded in observable evidence, then it is not self-evident either. The passage provides no basis for linking these two properties in this way. Observable evidence and self-evidence are treated as independent properties in the passage. The second statement mentions beliefs that lack BOTH properties, but that does not mean lacking one entails lacking the other. A belief could be self-evident (like a basic logical truth) without being grounded in observable evidence, or grounded in observable evidence without being self-evident. The passage's description of beliefs lacking both properties does not establish a conditional relationship between the two.

  5. Correct69% picked this

    Among reasonable beliefs that are not self-evident, there are some beliefs that are not grounded

    Why this is right

    Combine the two statements. The second statement tells us: some beliefs are based on a reliable source, are not self-evident, and are not grounded in observable evidence. The first statement tells us: beliefs based on a reliable source are reasonable. Therefore, those beliefs from the second statement are reasonable. This gives us beliefs that are (1) reasonable, (2) not self-evident, and (3) not grounded in observable evidence. This answer captures exactly that conclusion: among reasonable beliefs that are not self-evident, there exist some that are not grounded in observable evidence. Every step follows necessarily from the stated facts with no additional assumptions required.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free