Reading Comprehension

PT158 · S1 · P1 · Q3 Deep Well Injection

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

A major problem facing industrial societies is their exponentially increasing production of toxic waste.

Topic

The risks and problems associated with deep-well injection as a method for hazardous waste disposal in industrial societies.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

Although deep-well injection is increasingly used to dispose of hazardous waste due to cost and regulatory pressures, it poses significant risks—including mechanical failure, human error, and unpredictable underground movement of waste—that make it a problematic and potentially dangerous solution. Most Valuable Sentence: Last paragraph:

P1: Introduction to Deep-Well Injection and Its Controversy

This paragraph introduces the growing problem of toxic waste in industrial societies, describes how regulations and costs have led to the increased use of deep-well injection for hazardous-waste disposal, and notes that this method is controversial, especially as more people depend on underground water sources. It ends by foreshadowing that there are three key problems with this method.

P2: Mechanical Failures and Human Error

Here, the passage explains the first two major problems: wells can leak, allowing dangerous chemicals into drinking water sources, and human error (like faulty well construction) can have dire consequences. Example: a well with a casing gap almost contaminated water for 100,000 people, and such issues might go unnoticed for a long time.

P3: Unpredictable Movement of Underground Waste

This paragraph details the third problem: it’s extremely difficult to predict how wastes will move underground due to complex, variable pressure gradients. Wastewater can travel in any direction, sometimes over great distances, making containment unpredictable.

3.

Which one of the following would, if true, most strengthen the author's position regarding the risks of deep-well injection of hazardous wastes?

  1. Few of the rock formations

    Weakens

    This makes drilling sound safer, since if the suitable injection sites are far from being connected to sources of drinkable groundwater, then there's less chance that doing a deep well injection will taint any drinking water.

    12% picked this

  2. Few of the toxic substances

    No Impact

    The fact that they haven't been tested on nonhuman organisms doesn't tell us anything: - have they been tested on humans? - would the tests come back showing these substances are bad or benign?

    7% picked this

  3. Many of the sites at

    Weak Impact

    This seems to only present a possible concern about whether the toxic waste would spill out of the transportation device, as it leaves the industrial facilities en route to the deep well injection site. But we have no reason to think the toxic waste trucks that are moving it from the factory to the injection site are known to spill this waste en route.

    2% picked this

  4. Correct

    The movement of underground water

    Why this is right

    The 3rd problem the author brought up related to the unpredictable movement of the toxic waste once it's underground. The author compared this to the unpredictable movement of water underground. So if the movement is even more fast and random than most geologists believe, then it's likely that toxic waste is also going to move more quickly and randomly than most geologists think, which heightens the danger of the 3rd problem. It's weird to me that this correct answer tries to play off "the experts being wrong". We don't know how fast or unpredictable geologists think that underground water moves, but if most of them believe it moves at speed X, that would apparently be the conventional wisdom of the experts. And if the danger of random underground movement of water / toxic wastes is actually scarier than the experts give it credit for being, then that makes it sound like injecting toxic waste is riskier than most experts think.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    78% picked this

  5. Methods of predicting and monitoring

    Weakens

    This has the opposite effect of (D). Instead of saying, "The experts just don't know. The author is right to be scared. It's way worse than the experts think", this is saying "The author just doesn't know. It's not as scary as she thinks. We've gotten a lot better at predicting underground movement."

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free