PT158 S2 Q8 ExplanationSociologist: Some anthropologists claim

Answer choices, explained

1. A

   Opposite19% picked this

   can save those cultures capable of reflecting on their customs and

   This answer says the strategy "can save those cultures capable of reflecting on their customs." But the sociologist's entire point is that the strategy cannot save any culture, because abandoning essential traditions eliminates the culture rather than preserving it. Saying the strategy works for some cultures directly contradicts the sociologist's reasoning. The sociologist does not distinguish between reflective and non-reflective cultures — the premise that "each" tradition is essential applies universally. If every tradition is essential, then the strategy fails for all cultures, not just some.

   19%
2. B

   Correct76% picked this

   will ensure the elimination of a culture rather than prevent

   Why this is right

   This answer perfectly completes the sociologist's reasoning. The anthropologists propose abandoning many traditions to save others and thereby prevent cultural decay. The sociologist counters: each tradition is essential to cultural identity. Therefore, abandoning many traditions does not preserve the culture — it eliminates it. The strategy achieves the opposite of its goal. Instead of preventing decay (gradual deterioration), it ensures elimination (total destruction). The culture does not slowly weaken; it ceases to exist, because the essential components of its identity have been removed. This answer captures the self-defeating nature of the proposed strategy: the cure is not merely ineffective — it is more destructive than the disease.

   Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   76%
3. C

   Out of Scope, Opposite0% picked this

   can be implemented by all and only those cultures studied

   This answer introduces two ideas absent from the argument: (1) that only cultures studied by anthropologists can implement the strategy, and (2) that the strategy "can be implemented" at all in the positive sense. The sociologist never discusses which cultures anthropologists study, nor does the sociologist concede that the strategy is implementable in a meaningful way. The sociologist's point is that the strategy is self-defeating for any culture that tries it. Additionally, the phrase "all and only" introduces a bizarre scope limitation — tying the strategy to anthropological study — that has no connection to the argument about tradition and cultural identity.

   0%
4. D

   Opposite2% picked this

   constitutes the most effective response to the threat of

   This answer says the strategy "constitutes the most effective response to cultural decay." This is the anthropologists' position, not the sociologist's conclusion. The sociologist is arguing against the strategy, not endorsing it. The entire structure of the argument is: anthropologists say X, but here is why X is self-defeating. The blank needs to express the sociologist's critique, not a superlative endorsement of the approach the sociologist is dismantling.

   2%
5. E

   Out of Scope3% picked this

   can succeed if adopted by cultures whose traditions have been adopted

   This answer introduces a qualification — that the strategy can work for cultures with recently adopted traditions. But the sociologist's premise states that "each" of a culture's traditions is essential, with no distinction between old and new traditions. Whether a tradition was adopted recently or centuries ago is irrelevant if each one is essential to identity. This answer tries to carve out an exception that the premise's universal language does not allow. Additionally, the sociologist's argument builds toward a negative conclusion about the strategy, not toward identifying special cases where it might succeed.

   3%