Reading Comprehension

PT158 · S1 · P3 · Q14 Plagiarism

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Passage A is adapted from an essay by historian Christopher Ricks; passage B is from the introduction, by historian Paulina Kewes, to a book in which Ricks's essay appears.

https://assets.lsatlab.com/uploads/2020/11/pt90-psg3.mp4

Topic

The debate over how to approach the concept of plagiarism—whether as a moral issue or as a historically relative idea shaped by power and context.

Framework

Present Debate

Main Point

Ricks (Passage A) criticizes historical (especially postmodern) approaches to plagiarism that see it merely as a power construct rather than a moral failing, arguing this undermines valuable moral judgments; Kewes (Passage B) counters that while some historical approaches are flawed, proper historical context is valuable and not inherently relativist. **Most Valuable Sentence(s):** - Passage A, last paragraph: - Passage B, last paragraph:

P1: Passage A — Critique of Postmodern Approach

Ricks argues that Rosenthal’s history of plagiarism erases differences between key concepts like plagiarism, imitation, and originality, reducing the idea of plagiarism to a matter of power dynamics, rather than genuine moral concern.

P2: Passage A — Political vs. Moral Dimensions

He complains that Rosenthal's "political" approach ignores honest/dishonest distinctions, instead focusing solely on the context and power structures surrounding a text or author.

14.

Both passages are concerned with answering which one of the following questions?

How did the modern concept
No Support from Passage A
Having only read A, we would not consider this one. It's nowhere near our goal for A, which was something like "Is it dumb to talk about plagiarism without mentioning its moral dishonesty"?
1% picked this
During what historical period did
No Support from Passage A
Having only read A, we would not consider this one. It's nowhere near our goal for A, which was something like "Is it dumb to talk about plagiarism without mentioning its moral dishonesty"?
1% picked this
How has the relationship between
No Support from Passage A
Having only read A, we would not consider this one. It's nowhere near our goal for A, which was something like "Is it dumb to talk about plagiarism without mentioning its moral dishonesty"?
8% picked this
What are the significant differences
Almost No Support from Passage A
Having only read A, we would not consider this one. It's at least mentioning plagiarism (finally), but it's putting "plagiarism vs. imitation" center stage, and passage A only mentioned imitation in passing, on an equal level with adaptation, repetition, and originality. Our goal for A was something like "Is it dumb to talk about plagiarism without mentioning its moral dishonesty"?
4% picked this
Correct
How is the moral dimension
Why this is right
We could actually get this right having only read Passage A! The author of Passage A is mad at Rosenthal for making it seem like plagiarism is indecipherable from harmless things like adaptation, repetition, and originality, and like people just switch to using the harsh pejorative "plagiarism" as a political power move to negatively brand something they don't like. The author of A thinks it's dumb to talk about plagiarism without acknowledging that it is an immoral, dishonest act. A's final sentence is saying that the extirpation (elimination, removal) of moral considerations from political histories is a sad loss to political history, so we know that the author of A would say political history should be understanding plagiarism with a moral dimension as well. The final paragraph of B is also saying that even if we now see plagiarism with our enlightened modern eyes, when we talk about how it historically, we shouldn't use our postmodern relativistic amoral language. We should use the moral language of how that time period saw plagiarism.
Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
86% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free