Reading Comprehension

PT156 · S1 · P2 · Q8 Art Subsidies

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Passage AWhat public interest is served by an earmarked tax for the arts?

Topic

The debate over whether public (tax) funding for the arts is justified.

Framework

Present Debate

Main Point

Passage A argues that public arts funding is justified because it promotes equitable access and builds social capital in communities. Passage B counters that government subsidies for the arts are not justified, as they do not necessarily serve the majority’s tastes or represent a true public good and undermine individual choice. Most valuable sentences: Passage A — (P2) Passage B — (P3)

P1 (Passage A): Raises the Question of Justifying Arts Subsidies

The author asks why the government should fund the arts and insists that merely serving large or diverse audiences isn’t enough to justify public spending over private funding.

P2 (Passage A): Argues for Equity and Access

The public sector is necessary, the author says, because private funding alone leads to inequitable access—people with less money or those in culturally underserved regions miss out.

P3 (Passage A): Social Capital and Civic Benefits

Arts organizations strengthen community ties and increase civic engagement, offering broader social benefits beyond just enjoyment of the art itself.

8.

Both passages are concerned with answering which one of the following questions?

  1. Does public funding for the

    Trap

    Out of Scope Psg A: quality of art Passage A is never weighing the question of whether public funding raises the quality of art. The author is arguing that public funding is justifiable because it expands access to art. Passage B barely brings up "quality of art" at all, other than to say, "Even if we could guaranteed better art".

    1% picked this

  2. Does broader access to the

    Wrong Emphasis

    The fact that this answer doesn't mention tax-funded arts subsidies in any specific way makes it seem very unlikely to be true. Technically, the question stem didn't ask for a question the authors were primarily concerned with answering, so the correct answer doesn't necessarily have to be the main question the passages are answering, but we'd be crazy not to initially look for / hope that the correct answer will reward the central question the two passages have in common. The author of Passage A seems to think that subsidies are good because they lead to broader access and more socioeconomically diverse audiences. The author of Passage B is dubious that the type of unpopular art that normally gets subsidized even has a widespread audience, or would make more people go out and see art. So while we can probably infer Passage A's answer to this question and Passage B's answer to this question (if we assume that this "broader access" is resulting from arts subsidies), it's certainly not the most attractive answer because it doesn't relate to the central question both passages have in common, which is about public art subsidies.

    1% picked this

  3. Correct

    Is public funding for the

    Why this is right

    This is the central question both authors are considering. The beginning of Passage A's second paragraph indicates her answer to this question: "Public support of the arts, in fact, is eminently justifiable", and the rest of the 2nd and 3rd paragraph try to explain why. Passage B's second sentence immediately focuses in on this question about whether tax-funded subsidies are justifiable. That conversation continues all throughout B and ends with B's conclusion in the final sentence: "For these reasons, there can be no justification for arts subsidies".

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    98% picked this

  4. Is access to the arts

    Unsupported Both Passages

    Neither passage provides an answer to this highly binary question. Passage A thinks that arts subsidies can be justified because they create more broad access to the arts, but we don't really know whether she would say that the current state of affairs is that access is / isn't distributed broadly. Similarly, Passage B never weighs in on this sort of language. He is skeptical that subsidized art broadens access to art, because he doesn't think most subsidized art is the kind people want to consume. But he never addresses the issue of whether or not we would consider people's current access to the arts as "broadly distributed" or not.

    1% picked this

  5. Is there a direct relationship

    Unsupported Passage B

    This is certainly nowhere near the main topic of either passage, because it doesn't mention tax-funded subsidies for art. Passage A suggests that there can be a direct relationship between participation in the arts and civic involvement, within her final paragraph. But Passage B never addresses this issue at all. We have no idea if he thinks that when people participate in the arts it affects (or doesn't affect) their civic involvement.

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free