PT156 S1 P2 Q8 ExplanationArt Subsidies

Answer choices, explained

1. A

   Trap1% picked this

   Does public funding for the arts raise the quality of the

   Out of Scope Psg A: quality of art Passage A is never weighing the question of whether public funding raises the quality of art. The author is arguing that public funding is justifiable because it expands access to art. Passage B barely brings up "quality of art" at all, other than to say, "Even if we could guaranteed better art".

   1%
2. B

   Wrong Emphasis1% picked this

   Does broader access to the arts result in more

   The fact that this answer doesn't mention tax-funded arts subsidies in any specific way makes it seem very unlikely to be true. Technically, the question stem didn't ask for a question the authors were primarily concerned with answering, so the correct answer doesn't necessarily have to be the main question the passages are answering, but we'd be crazy not to initially look for / hope that the correct answer will reward the central question the two passages have in common. The author of Passage A seems to think that subsidies are good because they lead to broader access and more socioeconomically diverse audiences. The author of Passage B is dubious that the type of unpopular art that normally gets subsidized even has a widespread audience, or would make more people go out and see art. So while we can probably infer Passage A's answer to this question and Passage B's answer to this question (if we assume that this "broader access" is resulting from arts subsidies), it's certainly not the most attractive answer because it doesn't relate to the central question both passages have in common, which is about public art subsidies.

   1%
3. C

   Correct97% picked this

   Is public funding for the arts a justifiable use of

   Why this is right

   This is the central question both authors are considering. The beginning of Passage A's second paragraph indicates her answer to this question: "Public support of the arts, in fact, is eminently justifiable", and the rest of the 2nd and 3rd paragraph try to explain why. Passage B's second sentence immediately focuses in on this question about whether tax-funded subsidies are justifiable. That conversation continues all throughout B and ends with B's conclusion in the final sentence: "For these reasons, there can be no justification for arts subsidies".

   Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

   97%
4. D

   Unsupported Both Passages1% picked this

   Is access to the arts distributed

   Neither passage provides an answer to this highly binary question. Passage A thinks that arts subsidies can be justified because they create more broad access to the arts, but we don't really know whether she would say that the current state of affairs is that access is / isn't distributed broadly. Similarly, Passage B never weighs in on this sort of language. He is skeptical that subsidized art broadens access to art, because he doesn't think most subsidized art is the kind people want to consume. But he never addresses the issue of whether or not we would consider people's current access to the arts as "broadly distributed" or not.

   1%
5. E

   Unsupported Passage B0% picked this

   Is there a direct relationship between participation in the arts and

   This is certainly nowhere near the main topic of either passage, because it doesn't mention tax-funded subsidies for art. Passage A suggests that there can be a direct relationship between participation in the arts and civic involvement, within her final paragraph. But Passage B never addresses this issue at all. We have no idea if he thinks that when people participate in the arts it affects (or doesn't affect) their civic involvement.

   0%