Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT156 S4 Q4 ExplanationOvercrowding inclines human beings toward

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Overcrowding inclines human beings toward aggressive, competitive behavior. Just consider the behavior of normally considerate people driving in rush-hour traffic or attending crowded sporting events. This shows that, as world population continues to grow, will become more frequent and severe.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Each of the following, if true, strengthens the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Strengthens3% picked this

    The frequency and severity of overcrowding in the past have been roughly proportional to the

    This choice suggests that overcrowding is proportional to world population growth, supporting the assumption that a growing population leads to more overcrowding.

  2. Strengthens1% picked this

    The frequency and severity of war and crime have generally increased in the past century, and world population

    This choice presents a correlation between a growing population and increased instances of war and crime, thereby making the conclusion that such aggressive behavior will result from overcrowding more plausible. Correlations don't prove there's a causal connection between two things, but they are evidence that there could be a causal connection between two things.

  3. Correct95% picked this

    Some forms of aggressive, competitive behavior, including war, tend to occur even in situations in which human

    Why this is right

    This doesn't strengthen the story that "more people >> more overcrowding >> more aggression/war/crime", since it's talking about aggressive behavior happening even when it's not overcrowded.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Strengthens1% picked this

    With respect to its effect on behavior, rush-hour traffic is an example of a situation in which

    The author was using rush-hour traffic as an example of overcrowding leading to aggression. This choice affirms the author's assumption that rush-hour is indeed an example of overcrowding.

  5. Strengthens1% picked this

    Most mammals inhabiting a given region exhibit increasingly aggressive, competitive behavior as their population density

    This choice states that as population density increases (a synonym for population growth / overcrowding), most mammals (including humans) display more aggressive behavior. By supporting the notion that overcrowding leads to aggression in mammals generally, it indirectly strengthens the claim about human behavior.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free