Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT156 S1 P1 Q4 Explanation

Heirloom Crops

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsPrimary PurposeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Because most agricultural practices in North America produce row after row of only a few, genetically identical, varieties of crops, the continent's food system rests precariously on a rapidly eroding genetic base, increasingly susceptible to pests and disease. As a possible solution, agricultural researchers, development experts, and policy makers are searching for for economic reasons, they are not always suited to preserving a diverse pool of crop genetics.

A recent study describes how generations of indigenous farmers relied on their understanding of practical genetics to develop hundreds of varieties of each indigenous plant cultivated. For example, long aware of the technique referred to now as hybridization, indigenous farmers frequently used the pollen from one variety of corn to fertilize another are less dependent on intensive irrigation systems because they have been selectively bred for particular environments.

Many of these heirloom varieties are preserved in household seed stocks by indigenous farmers who obtain seeds through long-standing family, community, and regional exchange networks; similarly, knowledge of the required development and cultivation methods has been maintained through the centuries by intergenerational exchanges within an oral tradition. Over the past century, however, the conservation of diverse crop genetics, thus bolstering the long-term sustainability of the continent's agricultural systems.

What this question is testing

Primary Purpose

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

The author's main purpose in writing the passage

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: criticize current efforts2% picked this

    criticize current efforts to solve a

    The passage only ever seems critical when discussing the "profit-maximizing" approach we've been using in past decades, which has gotten us into this jam. The author seems very on-board with the efforts to solve this genetic diversity problem by harnessing the value of heirloom varieties.

  2. Out of Scope: two approaches1% picked this

    contrast two approaches to solving a

    There's only one approach mentioned in this passage for combating the precarious lack of crop diversity (conserve the wealth of genetic info contained in heirloom varieties). It's described in the second sentence of the passage and then elaborated on for the rest of the passage.

  3. Out of Scope: propose novel solution11% picked this

    propose a novel solution to a

    This purpose would work if the author herself were suggesting something that hadn't been suggested previously. A "novel" solution means a "new" one. ('Novel' is like nuevo in Spanish ... when we talk about the novelty of something wearing off, we're talking about the newness wearing off) The solution discussed in this passage isn't the author's. She's not proposing it. The second sentence tells us that agricultural researchers, development experts, and policy makers are already on the case of trying to harness the value of heirloom varieties "as a possible solution" to this genetic diversity problem. In short, this answer gives the author credit for being the first one to propose using heirlooms as a solution, but the passage indicates that people have already had that idea and started working on it.

  4. Too Strong: definitive4% picked this

    praise a definitive solution to a

    Wow, knowing we wanted a Problem / Solution type answer is of little help with this set of choices. They're all talking about solutions and problems. This one is too strong, because nowhere in the passage do we hear that trying to harness the wisdom of heirlooms is a definitive solution. We only hear about it "as a possible solution".

  5. Correct81% picked this

    support a promising approach to a

    Why this is right

    This isn't overly strong like (D). It's promising, not definitive. This puts the author on the side of the solution, unlike (A), but it doesn't falsely give the author credit for the solution, like (C). It's just saying, "the author is discussing a possible solution to a problem in a supportive way". And our author clearly seems to see the wisdom in pursuing heirloom varieties and has a lot of respect for the indigenous farming methods whose storehouse of knowledge we're hoping to tap into.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free