Reading Comprehension

PT156 · S1 · P1 · Q4 Heirloom Crops

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Because most agricultural practices in North America produce row after row of only a few, genetically identical, varieties of crops, the continent's food system rests precariously on a rapidly eroding genetic base, increasingly susceptible to pests and disease.

Topic

North American agriculture’s growing reliance on a few genetically identical crops, and the importance of conserving heirloom crop varieties and indigenous agricultural knowledge.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The main point is that North American agriculture is at risk due to its dependence on a narrow genetic base, and that saving heirloom crop varieties—and the indigenous knowledge that sustains them—is essential for more sustainable, pest- and disease-resistant farming. The Most Valuable Sentence: This idea is summed up at the end of the last paragraph:

P1: The Problem—Genetic Uniformity and Its Risks

North America mostly grows just a few, genetically identical crops, which makes the entire food system vulnerable to pests and diseases. The author introduces heirloom crops as a possible solution, noting they've only recently been recognized as valuable by mainstream scientists. Traditional methods focused on maximizing yield don’t maintain genetic diversity.

P2: Indigenous Methods and Genetic Diversity

Indigenous farmers have a long history of using practical genetics, such as hybridization, to create many different types of crops that are naturally more resistant to pests and tailored to their environment. These heirloom crops need less irrigation because they've been adapted for specific local conditions.

P3: Seeds, Knowledge, and Current Threats

Indigenous farmers have maintained both seeds and the knowledge to grow them through family and community networks. But, modern economic pressures and market economies have led to fewer small farmers, a move toward commercial seeds, and loss of these exchange networks. The author argues urgent action is needed to preserve both the genetic resources (heirloom crops) and the indigenous knowledge, to ensure future sustainability for agriculture.

4.

The author's main purpose in writing the passage is to

  1. criticize current efforts to solve

    Out of Scope: criticize current efforts

    The passage only ever seems critical when discussing the "profit-maximizing" approach we've been using in past decades, which has gotten us into this jam. The author seems very on-board with the efforts to solve this genetic diversity problem by harnessing the value of heirloom varieties.

    2% picked this

  2. contrast two approaches to solving

    Out of Scope: two approaches

    There's only one approach mentioned in this passage for combating the precarious lack of crop diversity (conserve the wealth of genetic info contained in heirloom varieties). It's described in the second sentence of the passage and then elaborated on for the rest of the passage.

    1% picked this

  3. propose a novel solution to

    Out of Scope: propose novel solution

    This purpose would work if the author herself were suggesting something that hadn't been suggested previously. A "novel" solution means a "new" one. ('Novel' is like nuevo in Spanish ... when we talk about the novelty of something wearing off, we're talking about the newness wearing off) The solution discussed in this passage isn't the author's. She's not proposing it. The second sentence tells us that agricultural researchers, development experts, and policy makers are already on the case of trying to harness the value of heirloom varieties "as a possible solution" to this genetic diversity problem. In short, this answer gives the author credit for being the first one to propose using heirlooms as a solution, but the passage indicates that people have already had that idea and started working on it.

    11% picked this

  4. praise a definitive solution to

    Too Strong: definitive

    Wow, knowing we wanted a Problem / Solution type answer is of little help with this set of choices. They're all talking about solutions and problems. This one is too strong, because nowhere in the passage do we hear that trying to harness the wisdom of heirlooms is a definitive solution. We only hear about it "as a possible solution".

    4% picked this

  5. Correct

    support a promising approach to

    Why this is right

    This isn't overly strong like (D). It's promising, not definitive. This puts the author on the side of the solution, unlike (A), but it doesn't falsely give the author credit for the solution, like (C). It's just saying, "the author is discussing a possible solution to a problem in a supportive way". And our author clearly seems to see the wisdom in pursuing heirloom varieties and has a lot of respect for the indigenous farming methods whose storehouse of knowledge we're hoping to tap into.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    82% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free