Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT156 S1 P4 Q26 Explanation

Sand Fossils

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsLocal PurposeScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

`Discovered in 1993, the site known as Ukhaa Tolgod, in the Gobi desert of Mongolia, is one of the world's best sources of fossils from the Late Cretaceous period, which ended about 65 million years ago. The dinosaur, lizard, and mammal fossils from this area, including skeletal structures less than 2 millimeters scientists analyzing the geological formations of Ukhaa Tolgod indicates that this sandstorm hypothesis is probably mistaken.

The scientists found that there are three distinct types of sandstone at the site. The first exhibits a well-defined structure of layers tilted at 25 degrees and sorted by particle size. Such arrangements are typical of deposits created from windblown sand. While this sandstone contains dinosaur footprints, it contains no skeletal remains. this third type of deposit that all the vertebrate skeletal fossils of Ukhaa Tolgod are found.

This third type of sandstone exhibits a structure similar to that caused by a phenomenon in which an otherwise stable sand dune becomes drenched with water from heavy rains, triggering a sudden debris flow. The resulting avalanche of sand can be as powerful and violent as a snow avalanche or mudslide. Such were in its path, resulting in the pristine quality of the remains.

The cause of these sandslides is not well understood. However, there is evidence that clay plays an important role. When windblown clay particles deposited by dust storms are moistened with rain, the wet clay filters into the dune and adheres to individual sand grains. The buildup of clay eventually inhibits drainage of time was not a sterile desert, but a stable dune field with plant life and rain.

What this question is testing

Local Purpose

Your task

Identify why the author included the referenced detail at that point in the passage — its function, not its content.

Common trap

Answers that merely repeat or summarize the topic of the detail instead of describing the role it plays.

Winning move

Ask what job the detail does for the paragraph, then for the passage's broader point.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
26.

The author's main purpose in discussing the sandstorm hypothesis (last two sentences of the first

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: question the wisdom2% picked this

    question the wisdom of the scientists who formulated the

    The function of this part isn't to mock the sandstorm scientists for being dumb. A lot of initial hypotheses are wrong. That's science. We don't make it personal. Notice that trap answers on Local Purpose questions often use words from within the detail sentence(s) we're being asked about, whereas the correct answer usually sounds more like the parts of the passage that surround the detail sentence(s).

  2. Correct81% picked this

    provide the basis for a contrast with a competing hypothesis that is discussed in the

    Why this is right

    The competing hypothesis is the sandslide hypothesis. The author is establishing in that final sentence of the 1st paragraph: 1. we've got some new data about the geological formations of the fossil site 2. it makes us think that it wasn't sandstorms (so now we have this new hypothesis instead)

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope8% picked this

    explain the geological basis for the

    Out of Scope: geological basis Too Narrow: only covers 1st sentence Nothing in these sentences explains a geological basis (there's no discussion of properties of the rock the fossils were found in). If we got rid of the word "geological", then it's probably fair to say the first of the two sentences explains to us the rationale that underlaid the sandstorm hypothesis. But this answer doesn't cover the second of the two sentences at all. Notice, again, that the trap answer tries to make you look within the detail sentence(s), whereas the correct answer speaks to things that surround the detail sentence(s).

  4. Out of Scope: hindered4% picked this

    show how adherence to the sandstorm hypothesis previously hindered a type of research that has now turned

    There's no indication that because of people's devotion to the sandstorm hypothesis there wasn't some fruitful form of research being done. No causal connection is drawn between the previous theory and conducting any type of research.

  5. Too Strong: ignored6% picked this

    establish that scientists formulating the sandstorm hypothesis ignored crucial evidence, which is discussed later

    This sounds harsh and accusatory. The reason we now think the sandstorm hypothesis is probably wrong is based on new evidence gathered by scientists. So the older scientists couldn't have been ignoring evidence that hadn't even been gathered yet.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free