Reading Comprehension

PT156 · S1 · P2 · Q12 Art Subsidies

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Passage AWhat public interest is served by an earmarked tax for the arts?

Topic

The debate over whether public (tax) funding for the arts is justified.

Framework

Present Debate

Main Point

Passage A argues that public arts funding is justified because it promotes equitable access and builds social capital in communities. Passage B counters that government subsidies for the arts are not justified, as they do not necessarily serve the majority’s tastes or represent a true public good and undermine individual choice. Most valuable sentences: Passage A — (P2) Passage B — (P3)

P1 (Passage A): Raises the Question of Justifying Arts Subsidies

The author asks why the government should fund the arts and insists that merely serving large or diverse audiences isn’t enough to justify public spending over private funding.

P2 (Passage A): Argues for Equity and Access

The public sector is necessary, the author says, because private funding alone leads to inequitable access—people with less money or those in culturally underserved regions miss out.

P3 (Passage A): Social Capital and Civic Benefits

Arts organizations strengthen community ties and increase civic engagement, offering broader social benefits beyond just enjoyment of the art itself.

12.

The authors would be most likely to disagree over whether tax-funded arts subsidies

  1. Correct

    build social capital

    Why this is right

    We would only come to this answer as a last resort. Passage A clearly agrees with this because she says as much in her final paragraph. How do we support that Passage B disagrees? Passage B never talks about social capital, so how can we support the idea that Passage B believes "tax-funded art subsidies don't build social capital"? The idea of building social capital was the idea that when there is publicly funded art, people who can't afford to otherwise see performances will come see them / they may even participate in local productions. Passage B is very dubious that art subsidies lead to greater public consumption of art. In part this is because he thinks that the type of art that gets subsidized is usually not the style most people would want to come out and consume. The first sentence of this 2nd paragraph is probably the best support sentence: It is doubtful that we could guarantee (with tax-funded art subsidies) more widespread aesthetic enjoyment. She goes on to say that subsidized art is not the art most would choose for themselves: "Most people will get what they don't like". So even though Passage B never discusses building social capital, the fact that B doesn't think that people like subsidized art or that subsidized art is likely to lead to more widespread aesthetic enjoyment, means that he would be pessimistic about the idea that subsidized art will somehow lead to building stronger communities through arts participation.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    41% picked this

  2. provide any benefits

    Unsupported Disagree Position

    Both authors would agree it provides some benefits. They would massively disagree on the scope and extent of those benefits, but we know Passage A is a fan of these subsidies, and Passage B acknowledges in its very first sentence that tax-funded arts subsidies "admittedly provide some incidental benefits (such as tourism)". We would need a really good support sentence to justify that either author believed "tax-funded arts subsidies provide zero benefits".

    26% picked this

  3. negatively impact private arts support

    Unsupported from Both

    Neither author talks about whether an increase in subsidies leads to less arts money coming from private sources.

    5% picked this

  4. guarantee better art than private

    Unsupported Agree Position

    We know that Passage B has got the disagree position covered, because he said "Even if we could guarantee better art", which implies "we cannot guarantee better art". But can we justify from Passage A's passage that A believes that subsidized art guarantees better art than private art? No, there's nothing in Passage A that vouches for a higher caliber of art. Passage A is just saying there will be more widespread enjoyment of art, not necessarily higher quality art.

    27% picked this

  5. encourage fiscal responsibility among arts

    Out of Scope: fiscal responsibility

    Neither author talks about tax-funded art leading to better budgeting / more efficient overhead for arts institutions.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free