Reading Comprehension

PT156 · S1 · P1 · Q2 Heirloom Crops

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Because most agricultural practices in North America produce row after row of only a few, genetically identical, varieties of crops, the continent's food system rests precariously on a rapidly eroding genetic base, increasingly susceptible to pests and disease.

Topic

North American agriculture’s growing reliance on a few genetically identical crops, and the importance of conserving heirloom crop varieties and indigenous agricultural knowledge.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The main point is that North American agriculture is at risk due to its dependence on a narrow genetic base, and that saving heirloom crop varieties—and the indigenous knowledge that sustains them—is essential for more sustainable, pest- and disease-resistant farming. The Most Valuable Sentence: This idea is summed up at the end of the last paragraph:

P1: The Problem—Genetic Uniformity and Its Risks

North America mostly grows just a few, genetically identical crops, which makes the entire food system vulnerable to pests and diseases. The author introduces heirloom crops as a possible solution, noting they've only recently been recognized as valuable by mainstream scientists. Traditional methods focused on maximizing yield don’t maintain genetic diversity.

P2: Indigenous Methods and Genetic Diversity

Indigenous farmers have a long history of using practical genetics, such as hybridization, to create many different types of crops that are naturally more resistant to pests and tailored to their environment. These heirloom crops need less irrigation because they've been adapted for specific local conditions.

P3: Seeds, Knowledge, and Current Threats

Indigenous farmers have maintained both seeds and the knowledge to grow them through family and community networks. But, modern economic pressures and market economies have led to fewer small farmers, a move toward commercial seeds, and loss of these exchange networks. The author argues urgent action is needed to preserve both the genetic resources (heirloom crops) and the indigenous knowledge, to ensure future sustainability for agriculture.

2.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author's attitude toward the value of heirloom crops?

  1. certainty that these crops will

    Too Strong: certainty / same

    This is positive, but way too extreme. We can't support claims like, "I am 100% certain that one day heirlooms will produce the same yield as a commercial seed but more economically." The author is certainly hopeful that heirloom varietals will be a part of our agricultural future, but she hasn't made the specific promise this answer is making.

    2% picked this

  2. relief that these crops have

    Opposite

    The passage is more of an alarm bell. The author is concerned because these crops haven't been used to maintain the genetic base. The first sentence tells us that "the continent's food system rests precariously on a rapidly eroding genetic base". As a possible solution, agricultural people are thinking about moving towards using heirlooms more, but that would be the future. This answer describes the past leading up to the present.

    3% picked this

  3. Correct

    optimism that the agricultural knowledge

    Why this is right

    This seems supported by the first two sentences: The first sentence tells us that "the continent's food system rests precariously on a rapidly eroding genetic base". The second says that, "As a possible solution" we're thinking about using heirloom varieties. If heirlooms are a potential solution to a rapidly eroding genetic base, then it makes sense to say that they would be "helping to bolster the genetic base of the continent's food system". The passage overall is very pro-heirloom, so we have no trouble supporting that the author is optimistic about the potential of heirlooms.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    89% picked this

  4. pride in the agricultural researchers

    Contradicted

    The 3rd sentence of the passage says that agricultural researchers have "only recently recognized heirlooms as a valuable resource". For too long, they have "tended to base their research and thinking solely on methods .... [that] ... seek to maximize the land's output, rather than one that preserve a diverse pool of crop varieties". This makes the passage sound like the author thought, "For generations, people have recognized the value of heirlooms". In reality, the passage is like, "We've got a big problem -- for generations, researchers have been obsessed with maximizing productivity and now we're at a precarious state of low crop diversity."

    4% picked this

  5. confidence that the world market

    Opposite, if anything

    The one mention of "the world market economy" occurs in the last paragraph, where it's saying that for the past 100 years, the world market economy has discouraged small-scale, internal food production. The result has been a dwindling number of small farmers, with many of these planting nonheirloom, commercial seed varieties. Since the world market economy seems to drive people toward income-generating work, which is code for "working on big farms that obsess over productivity", the world market economy seems to be oriented in the opposite direction of heirloom farming.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free