Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT159 S3 Q14 ExplanationGenerally, open discussion of a false and pernicious idea

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Generally, open discussion of a false and pernicious idea diminishes its appeal. Even in a flourishing democracy, however, certain misconceptions are so alluring that they when they are debated.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following principles is most clearly illustrated by the

Answer choices, explained

  1. Unsupported Recommendation: governments should1% picked this

    Democratic governments should be allowed on occasion to suppress debate regarding

    Whenever a Most Supported answer presents a recommendation, be skeptical! If the stimulus didn't say that specific party should act in that specific way, the answer is almost certainly wrong. Additionally, the stimulus expresses a tension surrouding open debate, but it doesn't suggest how we should respond to that tension. This answer is too speculative because it recommends a specific, unsupported response.

  2. Unsupported Comparison: Sometimes it is better18% picked this

    Sometimes it is better to openly discuss an idea even though doing so will increase the

    Whenever a Most Supported answer presents a comparison, be skeptical! If the stimulus didn't compare those two specific things on that one specific metric, the answer is probably wrong. Additionally, this answer has a similar problem as Answer Choice A: the stimulus expresses a tension surrouding open debate, but it doesn't suggest how we should respond to that tension. This answer is too speculative because it suggests one response is better than some unnamed alternative.

  3. Unsupported Relationship: pernicious ideas / misconceptions3% picked this

    Not all pernicious ideas are

    The weak degree of "not all" is attractive in Most Supported questions because it only requires one data point to prove. So, we ask ourselves: does this stimulus prove that there is at least one pernicious idea that is not a misconception? Nope. The only pernicious idea mentioned in the stimlus is "false and pernicious" which is by definition a misconception. While Answer Choice C may be true in real life, that doesn't mean it is well supported by this stimulus.

  4. Correct64% picked this

    Discussion and debate do not necessarily lead to a greater acceptance

    Why this is right

    This articulates the tension expressed in the stimulus and sounds like the "moral of the story" we're being told.

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Unsupported Causal Relationship: false / appealing14% picked this

    One of the reasons some ideas are appealing is that they

    The weak degree of "one of the reasons" and "some ideas" are both appealing in a Most Supported question because they only require one data point to prove. So, we ask ourselves: does this stimulus prove that there is at least one appealing idea that is appealing because it's false? Nope. We're told that certain false ideas are appealing, but we can't infer the Causal Relationship that they are appealing because of their falsity. Whenever a Most Supported answer presents a causal relationship, be skeptical and investigate it!

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free