Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT159 S4 P1 Q5 Explanation

Condorcet And Gouges

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

In France in the early 1790s, the French Revolution, which sought to establish universal individual rights in French society, inspired several arguments for women's rights. Two such arguments, articulated by Marquis de Condorcet and Olympe de Gouges, both active supporters of the Revolution, are especially noteworthy because they constitute radically opposed courses wellspring of all injustice experienced by women and should therefore be battled through direct political action.

Condorcet, a mathematician and member of the Academy of Sciences with an interest in social equality, did not separate the question of women's rights from the more general one of equal rights for all members of society, believing that all discrimination was an oversight, the result of not reasoning consistently or not inequality, he argued, this intellectually untenable situation of women's inequality was historically condemned to disappear soon.

Where Condorcet's arguments were purely theoretical and did not include specific legislative proposals to end the exclusion of women from politics, the tone and content of Gouges's proposals reflected her objective that women should become politically mobilized in a war against the injustices that she saw men stubbornly perpetuating. Gouges, a writer experiencing, but unfortunately, even in the atmosphere of the French Revolution, neither's views were widely accepted.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
5.

Based on the passage, Gouges would most likely have held that aiming to attain equality in marriage would not be a promising initial strategy for achieving overall equality

Answer choices

  1. Trap6% picked this

    the achievement of equal rights would require group mobilization, and marriage is a domain in which only

  2. Trap6% picked this

    society is unlikely to accept change within a traditional institution such

  3. Trap16% picked this

    marriage is inherently unequal if property is not

  4. Correct68% picked this

    equal political power is a prerequisite to equality in

    Why this is right

    Answer D is correct.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Trap5% picked this

    women's rights are a special case of political rights

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free