Logical Reasoning

PT159 · S3 · Q4 Toy manufacturer: Our competitors argue that we should withdraw our KlopperKidz

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Toy manufacturer: Our competitors argue that we should withdraw our KlopperKidz toys from stores because several children have allegedly been injured by them, and manufacturers should voluntarily withdraw toys that can lead to injury.

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

4.

The toy manufacturer's argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that it

  1. attempts to justify a conclusion

    Trap

    3% picked this

  2. rejects an argument on the

    Trap

    2% picked this

  3. assumes that merely because something

    Trap

    9% picked this

  4. Correct

    rejects an argument on the

    Why this is right

    Answer D is correct.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    86% picked this

  5. takes a necessary condition for

    Trap

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free