Critic: It generally holds true of concert pianists that the more famous the musician, the greater the pleasure of his or her audience. In my view, this is only fair and should give no cause audiences to distinguish good playing from bad.
What this question is testing
Conclusion
The critic says audiences enjoying famous pianists more is fine — it doesn't mean audiences are dumb.
Evidence
The pattern: more famous pianist, more audience pleasure.
Evaluate
For the critic's defense to make sense, fame has to actually track talent. If fame is just marketing or buzz, then audiences enjoying famous pianists more would suggest they can't tell good from bad — they'd just be reacting to celebrity.
So to strengthen the critic, we want to know that famous pianists really are more talented. Then audiences are tracking quality, not just fame.
Goal
Find the answer that connects pianists' fame to actual musical talent.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.