Logical Reasoning

PT159 · S3 · Q9 Having cameras at traffic intersections to automatically ticket cars

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Having cameras at traffic intersections to automatically ticket cars that run red lights might raise revenue for municipalities but does not increase traffic safety.

Conclusion

Having red light cameras might raise revenue for municipalities but doesn't increase traffic safety.

Intermediate Conclusion

Accidents increase at red-light camera intersections.

Evidence

There are fewer side-impact collisions but more rear-impact collisions.

Evaluate

The conclusion might look like a two-pronged claim, 1. red light cameras raise revenue 2. red light cameras don't increase traffic safety

... but it probably doesn't make sense to worry about that first claim. The author only says it might raise revenue, so she's not committing to it, and she doesn't offer any supporting ideas for it.

So let's focus on the second half, which is an Anti-Causal claim. They're saying red light cameras don't increase traffic safety, so we wanna try arguing that they do increase traffic safety.

The author will say,

How can we respond to that, if we're trying to say that red light cameras increased traffic safety?

Maybe we could say, ?

Or maybe we could say even though there are more collisions now, they are somehow safer collisions?

Goal

We need an answer that helps us say that even though there are more collisions than before at these red light camera interactions, the red light cameras have increased traffic safety.

9.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

  1. The revenue raised through automatically

    No Impact (other than traffic safety)

    As soon as we realize this answer is talking about things other than traffic safety, we know this isn't going to help us argue that "red light cameras do increase traffic safety".

    4% picked this

  2. Automatically generated tickets for running

    No Impact

    To the extent that we know tickets are being issued, this is strengthening the idea that red light cameras raise revenue. It definitely doesn't relate to safety at all, so there's no way we can use it to argue that red light cameras do increase safety.

    2% picked this

  3. Side-impact collisions are generally the

    No Impact

    Deciding which driver is at fault is unrelated to evaluating whether safety is increased.

    14% picked this

  4. Correct

    Side-impact collisions are a much

    Why this is right

    Yay, finally an answer about safety. And this does help us argue that red light cameras increase safety. After all, even though there are more rear-impact collisions, they aren't as much of a safety concern. There are fewer side-impact collisions, and those are a much greater safety threat. So we can argue that even though we have more collisions overall, the increase has been in mild ones and the decrease has been among terrible ones, so we're still having a net increase in safety (because you wouldn't just measure safety by number of collisions, but also by injuries and fatalities). To put this in more common sense terms, when you run a red light, the perpendicular flow of traffic has already gotten the green light and started driving through the intersection. The red-light runner plows into them at full speed (or maybe even worse because they're accelerating through the red light). That sort of side-impact collision could be really bad for the green light driver. Meanwhile, when you add the red light camera, that red light runner realizes they can't run the red light, so they slam on the brakes so that they're not running the red light, which could lead to the car behind them rear-ending them. That is a much lower speed collision.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    78% picked this

  5. Automatically generated tickets can punish

    No Impact

    Once again, this answer has nothing to do with safety, so it couldn't help us argue that red light cameras do increase traffic safety.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free